Europe's Message: Those Who Oppose EU Membership Are Violent
Nigel Farage On Brexit: "We Had Momentum Until This Terrible Tragedy" - Here Are The Latest Odds
The PhD Bubble Has Burst: Graduating 'Doctors' Are Having Trouble Finding Work
Dogshit & Sugar-Tax In Philadelphia: "The Stupid, It Burns"
Greeks Send An Open Letter To UK Citizens About Brexit
Huge Scandal Erupts Inside NATO: Alliance Member Germany Slams NATO "Warmongering" Against Russia
"Something is Going On" – And It's Worse Than You Thought
First Brexit Poll After Jo Cox Death Reveals Stunning Result
Read This Before The Government Uses The Orlando Shooting To Start Another War
BMG Polls Throw Mud In The Waters of Brexit Trends: Numbers Believable?
I hope it's bullet and knife proof...
Artist's Impression Of The Opening Ceremony At The Rio Olympics
Noam Chomsky On The Breakdown Of American Society & A World In Transition
Russia Warns US Against Striking Assad
Making 'The Unthinkable' The New Reality - Hogs To Slaughter
Hillary Clinton is leading Donald Trump by 10%. Why not 20%? Why not 50%? These numbers mean nothing with regard to the intentions of the people most likely to vote in the upcoming general election.
Well, based on these numbers reflecting a huge Clinton lead, we must assume that Donald Trump has no chance. Why even bother voting? Many who are influenced by the polls will conclude that nothing will ever change because that is because the polls say so. As people share their doubts about the viability about a Trump Presidency, the doubts spawned by the polls, will grow like wildfire. The polls negative projections about Donald Trump’s chances will cause all but the die-hard supporters to lose interest because their candidate cannot win.
Read More
from Truthstream Media:
Why? My only guess is they don’t want people watching this scene because it will make you question everything you’ve ever been told about Mr. Omar Mateen. He’s like the Lee Harvey Oswald of Orlando.
Why? My only guess is they don’t want people watching this scene because it will make you question everything you’ve ever been told about Mr. Omar Mateen. He’s like the Lee Harvey Oswald of Orlando.
from The Daily Bell:
When it comes to which candidate is best prepared to tackle matters of public health, the choice is clear to Microsoft co-founder and philanthropist Bill Gates. [He] told STAT News in an interview published Friday that while his organization would “approach any administration with a positive open mind,” he has more experience with both Hillary and Bill Clinton through the Clinton Foundation. – STAT
The STAT article excerpted above indicates that the Bill Gates is leaning toward endorsing Hillary Clinton.
It would be surprising if he didn’t.
One can make the argument that the Clinton Foundation is a kind of organized crime racket.
Read More
When it comes to which candidate is best prepared to tackle matters of public health, the choice is clear to Microsoft co-founder and philanthropist Bill Gates. [He] told STAT News in an interview published Friday that while his organization would “approach any administration with a positive open mind,” he has more experience with both Hillary and Bill Clinton through the Clinton Foundation. – STAT
The STAT article excerpted above indicates that the Bill Gates is leaning toward endorsing Hillary Clinton.
It would be surprising if he didn’t.
One can make the argument that the Clinton Foundation is a kind of organized crime racket.
Read More
by Anna Scanlon, Natural Society:
The Office of Inspector General (OIG) of the Department of Health and Human Services has recently conducted a study on food products the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recalled. The OIG has found that the FDA is unsatisfactorily-slow in initiating pulling products from the shelves, and may lead to a risk of disease and even death in the general population.
In one cited incident, the FDA failed to remove products with salmonella-tainted peanut butter for 165 days, even after 14 people reported symptoms of the illness. The FDA also took 81 days to recall a regional cheese product from Virginia, which left eight people ill and one person dead.
Read More
The Office of Inspector General (OIG) of the Department of Health and Human Services has recently conducted a study on food products the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recalled. The OIG has found that the FDA is unsatisfactorily-slow in initiating pulling products from the shelves, and may lead to a risk of disease and even death in the general population.
In one cited incident, the FDA failed to remove products with salmonella-tainted peanut butter for 165 days, even after 14 people reported symptoms of the illness. The FDA also took 81 days to recall a regional cheese product from Virginia, which left eight people ill and one person dead.
Read More
Past a possibly messy Brexit & elections in France and Germany
by Don Quijones, Wolf Street:
Senior bankers in Spain and Italy can breathe a collective sigh of relief after Europe’s finance and economic ministers decided on Friday to postpone, for at least 18 months, a decision on setting a limit on the government bonds some banks can hold as eligible “risk-free” capital. It was one of four things keeping Spanish senior bankers awake at night. Now, they can sleep a little sounder.
The initiative, initially proposed by the German government and supported by other fiscally hawkish governments such as Finland and the Netherlands, was intended to limit the purchase of public debt by banks, in order to break the vicious cycle of co-dependence that now exists between sovereign and bank risk.
If allowed to happen, the move could have posed a very serious threat to the balance sheets of many banks on the Eurozone periphery. According to European Central Bank data, euro-area sovereign bonds accounted for over 10% of banks’ assets in the Eurozone, or €2.73 trillion ($3 trillion), at the end of 2015 — over €300 billion more than at the end of 2014, on the eve of the ECB’s launch of its negative interest rate policy (NIRP).
Read More
by Don Quijones, Wolf Street:
Senior bankers in Spain and Italy can breathe a collective sigh of relief after Europe’s finance and economic ministers decided on Friday to postpone, for at least 18 months, a decision on setting a limit on the government bonds some banks can hold as eligible “risk-free” capital. It was one of four things keeping Spanish senior bankers awake at night. Now, they can sleep a little sounder.
The initiative, initially proposed by the German government and supported by other fiscally hawkish governments such as Finland and the Netherlands, was intended to limit the purchase of public debt by banks, in order to break the vicious cycle of co-dependence that now exists between sovereign and bank risk.
If allowed to happen, the move could have posed a very serious threat to the balance sheets of many banks on the Eurozone periphery. According to European Central Bank data, euro-area sovereign bonds accounted for over 10% of banks’ assets in the Eurozone, or €2.73 trillion ($3 trillion), at the end of 2015 — over €300 billion more than at the end of 2014, on the eve of the ECB’s launch of its negative interest rate policy (NIRP).
Read More
/
No comments:
Post a Comment