Say you are the CEO of Deutsche Bank (whoever that may be these days following Ackermann's stunner of an announcement
yesterday),
and you have so much dirty laundry that if the market so much as looks
at you funny, you know very well it is game over the second you have
to engage in reactionary damage control. After all
your assets are 84% if not more,
of total German GDP and there is no way that you can be bailed out by
one country alone, even if that country is the only one that is not a
complete Banana republic. So what do you do? Why you tell your bankers
to write the best, most persuasive pitch book they can come up with,
addressed to none other than Goldman Sachs alum and ECB head, Mario
Draghi, and you tell him the truth: "Europe has hit its Tipping Point"
and it is now or never. In other words, in 51 slides, your task is to
convince the ECB that unless they terminally break away with their
traditional stance of not monetizing, not only they, but the entire
European status quo will cease existing. And that's precisely what you
do.
Behold: "The Tipping Point - Time To Call The ECB" -
Deutsche Bank's definitive attempt to encapsulate the Mutual Assured
Destruction that we are "certainly" all going to suffer, unless the ECB
prints, and prints, and prints. The bottom line, you would
tell Draghi, is "do nothing, and pull the cord now; or do something,
risk hyperinflation which may or may not come, but at least extend and
pretend for a few years." And one wonders why Crude is about to pass
$100...
Investment
grade and high yield credit spreads are wider on the day (with
investment grade underperforming so far) but the divergence between a
somewhat well-synced equity and credit market yesterday and today's
ramp in stocks is remarkable. We suspect this is the hangover from
print-print-print expectations playing out in a more USD-based
numeraire stock market but the underperformance of HYG once again
suggests hedgers are more active in credit and less exuberant than
equity players. Broad risk markets are supportive of ES up here as
CONTEXT remains
in sync helped by Oil (which is odd given the divergent drop in the
Energy sector earlier this afternoon - CVX/RIG leak) and TSY 2s10s30s
mostly.
Alex Jones interviewing Jim Rogers (while exercising on a bike) in Nightly
News, InfoWars.
*Jim Rogers is an author, financial commentator and successful
international investor. He has been frequently featured in Time, The New
York Times, Barron’s, Forbes, Fortune, The Wall Street Journal, The
Financial Times and is a regular guest on Bloomberg and CNBC.*
Gold has been held in check below $1800 with the bulls unable or unwilling
to commit enough firepower to run the shorts out of their defensive line
erected at that level. Bears on the other hand cannot get anything going to
the downside either as buyers are surfacing on dips in price. The result is
more of the same - rangebound trade.
Sometimes there is not much worth commenting on concerning market action
and today is one of those days.
Uncertainty over European financial woes is keeping a firm bid in gold with
Euro-gold above the 1300 euro level.
One of my themes is that the business and political elite are stealing
money from the middle class and nothing is being done about it by the
people voted in office who are in charge of enforcing Rule of Law. Obama
was elected overwhelmingly on his promise to clean up DC and restore some
semblance of Constitutional-based justice in this country. He has failed
miserably. In fact, I see no evidence that he's even made *any* attempt to
honor his campaign promises.
And the corruption and theft is becoming more open and egregious now that
the crooks are the same ones who are supposed t...
more »
If only all our failures could be this lucrative. Headline: Fannie, Freddie
execs score $100 million payday NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Mortgage finance
giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac received the biggest federal bailout of
the financial crisis. And nearly $100 million of those tax dollars went to
lucrative pay packages for top executives, filings show. The top five
executives at Fannie Mae...
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other
content, and more! ]]
Sooner or later, the europeans, especially the ECB will have to monetize
and problems will be postponed for a while. - *in Bloomberg *
*Marc Faber is an international investor known for his uncanny predictions
of the stock market and futures markets around the world.*
When asked about gold, Armstrong responded, “Basically what you are doing
is you are building a sideways type of base. Eventually gold is going to
take off to the upside, but largely when people begin to see the Emperor
has no clothes and we’re getting close to that. I would only give it a few
more months.” The D-wave flush is underway. Capital uses it to reposition
into the secular up...
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other
content, and more! ]]
The wolf pack will continue pressuring Italian bond yields because it
understands that austerity within an economy dominated by the public sector
and saddled with massive debts is a bad combination. Smart money is looking
directly at Germany and France while headlines obsess about the periphery
of the sovereign debt crisis. Headline: EURO GOVT-Italian yields rise;
relief at new govt fades *...
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other
content, and more! ]]
About
a month ago we suggested that the EUR weakness was perhaps a major headfake
as liquidity runs and repatriation flows would sustain a
stronger-than-expected EUR (especially relative to the USD). Well, today
Deutsche Bank's Macro strategist points out that French balance of
payments data was hugely revealing about this potential source of
strength. While we note that EURUSD remains hugely disconnected from its
empirical relationship with sovereign spreads (GDP-weighted),
swap-spreads, financial-to-corporate risk differentials, and equity
prices - it seems the the typically negative investment abroad
(outflows) has now seen 4 months of inflows (too long a period to be
simply noise) and with considerable size also. While DB's analysis
offers little guidance on when this period of repatriation will be over -
we suspect there is more support to come than many expect - even as
everything points to a weaker EUR. Perhaps most interestingly, DB notes
one broad conclusion is that
the EUR is probably the worst instrument to express negative EUR area views, with both periphery bonds and equities purer gauges of stress.
Isn't trading this market fun? As readers will recall, one of the two
reasons for why the market plunged overnight was speculation that
Monti may have trouble forming a cabinet. As is to be expected, stocks
are now surging because according to recent information, at least the
Italian government unknown may be taken off the checklist, even if
nothing can be said about his ability to actually pass required
austerity, to chance the country's medieval labor laws, which are
controlled by the shadow government regardless, or the fact that Italy
has over $300 billion in debt to roll in the next year. From Reuters, "
Italian
Prime Minister designate Mario Monti will meet Italy's President on
Wednesday morning to inform him that he will be able to form the
country's next government, a statement from the presidential palace said
on Tuesday." Now, the other and far bigger reason for the
plunge in futures, it bears reminding, is that the Spanish bond auction
was a failure with just 3.2 EUR of the 3.5 EUR sought, was raised. If
only Goldman could wave its magic wand and fix this far bigger problem
which is endemic to all of Europe as it seeks to raise over $2 trillion
in the next 2-3 years. That, and the fact that Belgium, Spain, France,
Austria and virtually everyone else execept for Germany (for now)
closed at what are new all time high spreads.
The
stock market seems to be the last group still buying into the Europe "gets it" argument.
The credit markets now seem to be fully diverging from equities, and
offer more opportunities here than stocks. In credit, Europe is
starting to look attractive versus the US. Sovereign credit looks
better than bank credit in Europe. High Yield may not be bad here, but
we think HYG/JNK definitely got ahead of themselves at these prices.
Well,
it didn't take one day... It took a whopping two days for our always
contrarian call to do the opposite of what Goldman said on Friday, to
materialize. As we said on
Friday afternoon, "
Time to sell the EURUSD with both hands and feet, not to mention with MF Global-type leverage:
that uber-contrarian FX indicator, Goldman's Thomas Stolper, who has
not had a notable call correct in the past 2 years, just came out
with a long EURUSD call, calling for a 1.40 target and a 1.35 stop
loss. Yes, this means Goldman is now selling EURUSD until 1.40 and
will begin buying it at 1.35." 48 hours later Goldman's clients lose
big, Goldman's flow desk wins, and anyone who agreed with our
traditional cynicism made several thousand pips assuming the proper
use of MF type leverage.
While bubble-spotting among equity investing tilts is often futile, the ever-increasing call for investors to
buy high-quality dividend-paying stocks has become as over-used a term as 'long-term investor', and 'buy-the-dips'.
It seems the general belief is that a 3-5% dividend yield will provide
'protection' to cushion volatility as it offers income above
Treasuries. Back in
September we
highlighted both the apples-to-unicorns comparison that is dividend
yields to TSY yields and moreover, how risk (and ultimately capital
loss) should play a critical part in the decision of asset allocation.
Today we take a quick look at dividend stock performance over the last
few years and find something intriguing - and not often mentioned -
that
dividend stock portfolios appear to significantly
underperform in sell-offs and marginally underperform in rallies. So if
you want a high beta crowded trade, admittedly with some carry, buy
high quality dividend-paying stocks.
We all know some 3 trillion euros of debt in Europe is
uncollectible. So why isn't anyone talking about the one and only
solution, which is writing off all that debt? Since nobody
knows how much bad debt there actually is in the Eurozone--care to guess
on the market value of all those underwater mortgages in Spain or the
true size of Italy's debts?--that 3 trillion is just a guess, but it's
probably a reasonable starting point. Let's start with the most basic
fact about all this uncollectible, impaired, bad debt:
every euro of debt is somebody else's asset. Wipe out the debt and you wipe out the asset.
That's why there's no willingness to accept the writedown of debt:
somebody somewhere has to suck up 3 trillion euros of loss. Can we
please dispense with the fantasy "solutions"? There is no way Europe is
going to "grow its way out of this debt." How much of the eurozone's
"growth" was the result of rampant malinvestment and risky borrowing?
More than anyone dares admit. It won't take austerity to crash the
euroland economy, all it will take is turning off the debt spigot...
Life will go on if the banks are wiped out and closed, pension funds and insurance companies take losses, etc. If
those who made the bets for their own private gain aren't forced to
absorb the risk, then we don't live in either capitalism or democracy;
we live in a financial-fascist tyranny.
loss-absorbing capital to levels specified by regulators. They’re
doing this especially to hit the level of 9% core
capital-as-a-percentage of risk-weighted assets that the regulators
require as a response to the most recent stress tests. While actually
selling loans and exposures would be one way to achieve this so-called
“risk-weighted asset optimization”, it looks like many banks are
actually just choosing to fiddle around with the internal, self-created
risk models that both the current Basel II and the
not-so-new-and-improved Basel III regulatory regimes allow them to use.
Yes, these regulatory regimes allow the banks to decide, for
themselves, how risky their loans are. Which of course then drives how
much or how little loss-absorbing capital they must hold. Don’t worry,
though, because the regulators approve the models on a yearly basis.
And which banks have taken advantage of this so far?
If you find useful information, please consider making a small donation, to help cover some of the labor and cost for this blog.
Thank You
I'm PayPal Verified
No comments:
Post a Comment