
Volume
 was dismal - aside from a massive surge in S&P 500 e-mini  volumes 
as the combo Bernanke bluff and ECB bond-band-rumor hit the tape  and 
exploded stocks up from two-week lows. A late-day attempt to close  the 
S&P green for the week failed and the Dow ended with its first  down
 week in seven weeks - and largest loss in nine weeks - despite a  
magnificent centrally-planned triple-digit gain today (+100.1pts!) 
Stocks were 'aided' by new cycle highs in HYG
 as it saw its best performance in a month - amid massive fund inflows  
and heavy issuance (notably outperforming credit spreads in CDS land).  
The shift in HYG does look like some convergence trading with SPY  
though  - after a month of flat-lining. Gold (and even more so Silver)  
were the week's big performers (up 3.35% and 9.25% respectively) even as
  the USD only lost 1.1%. Treasuries ended the week better by 9 to 14bps
  (considerably different from stocks relative performance). 
The
  week was characterized simply as stocks bouncing between QE-off  
(Treasury strength) and QE-on (USD weakness and Gold strength) - on de  
minimus volumes.

The past several weeks have made one thing crystal-clear: Our country faces unmitigated disaster if the Other Side wins.
 

Thanks for everything...
 
  
 *I would just like to add that we see shares of Apple hitting new all-time 
highs, even though their last quarter wasn’t quite up to snuff.  But the 
market cap of Apple is now greater than three times that of all of the 
world’s publicly traded gold and silver equities...This will be seen as 
preposterous in the fullness of time, and I can assure that this will 
reverse as the bull market in gold and silver mature.*  - John Embry, King 
World News LINK
I felt compelled to comment on the new home sales number for July number 
reported yesterday because the headline was egregiously misleadi...  more »  
 
Donations will help maintain and defray the operational costs. Paypal, a leading provider of secure 
online money transfers, will handle the donations. Thank you for your 
contribution. 
I'm PayPal Verified
 
 
 Presented with little comment - for the simple reason it has become a joke...
Presented with little comment - for the simple reason it has become a joke...
 "The
 numbers are coming in and we are looking at them with a sense of  
amazement," is how the director of the Snow and Ice data center in  
Colorado describes the 'startlingly rapid rate' of melting at the Arctic Ice Cap this year. As Agence France Presse
 notes, if the melt stopped today, this would be the third lowest level 
 of ice on record. Of course while this maybe terrible news for some;  
others are 'increasingly interested'. The thaw in the Arctic is rapidly transforming the geopolitics of the region, with the long-forbidding ocean looking more attractive to the shipping and energy industries. The
  first ship from China – the Xuelong, or Snow Dragon – recently sailed 
 from the Pacific to the Atlantic via the Arctic Ocean, cutting the  
distance by more than 40%. Five nations surround the Arctic  
Ocean – Russia, which has about half of the coastline, along with  
Canada, Denmark, Norway and the United States – but the route could see a
  growing number of commercial players. Of course this 'benefit' of  
global warming appears to rely on the fact that there are people left to
  trade goods with.
"The
 numbers are coming in and we are looking at them with a sense of  
amazement," is how the director of the Snow and Ice data center in  
Colorado describes the 'startlingly rapid rate' of melting at the Arctic Ice Cap this year. As Agence France Presse
 notes, if the melt stopped today, this would be the third lowest level 
 of ice on record. Of course while this maybe terrible news for some;  
others are 'increasingly interested'. The thaw in the Arctic is rapidly transforming the geopolitics of the region, with the long-forbidding ocean looking more attractive to the shipping and energy industries. The
  first ship from China – the Xuelong, or Snow Dragon – recently sailed 
 from the Pacific to the Atlantic via the Arctic Ocean, cutting the  
distance by more than 40%. Five nations surround the Arctic  
Ocean – Russia, which has about half of the coastline, along with  
Canada, Denmark, Norway and the United States – but the route could see a
  growing number of commercial players. Of course this 'benefit' of  
global warming appears to rely on the fact that there are people left to
  trade goods with.
 With
 central bankers increasingly eclipsing even the most famous TV, music, 
and movie stars for the headlines, it appears the lengths we will go to 
in order to become 'famous' know no bounds. To wit, how to become famous? Appear famous!
With
 central bankers increasingly eclipsing even the most famous TV, music, 
and movie stars for the headlines, it appears the lengths we will go to 
in order to become 'famous' know no bounds. To wit, how to become famous? Appear famous!
 It
 seems everyone and their pet Goldfish has been brainwashed into the  
belief that because it's an election year, we have to buy stocks. There 
 is plenty of noise in that empirical study with some large outliers.  
However, Credit Suisse's Harley Bassman notes there is another cycle in 
 election years - that of implied volatility - and he adds "the clearly 
 defined economic nature of this election should increase implied  
volatility on most financial assets." As the chart below shows, volatilities tend to trough in August and peak in October into a November election - only to fall once again from two-weeks before to one week after the election. The pattern is clear.
It
 seems everyone and their pet Goldfish has been brainwashed into the  
belief that because it's an election year, we have to buy stocks. There 
 is plenty of noise in that empirical study with some large outliers.  
However, Credit Suisse's Harley Bassman notes there is another cycle in 
 election years - that of implied volatility - and he adds "the clearly 
 defined economic nature of this election should increase implied  
volatility on most financial assets." As the chart below shows, volatilities tend to trough in August and peak in October into a November election - only to fall once again from two-weeks before to one week after the election. The pattern is clear.
 The
 odds of Fed easing at the September FOMC meeting seem close to 50-50  
(with both sides vehemently talking their books - Fed officials and  
equity managers alike). Recent data has been a bit better: payrolls,  
claims, retail sales, and industrial production. As UBS' Drew Matus  
notes, other factors that will play a role include the ISM report,  
claims reports, and 'fiscal cliff'-related events. However, the primary determinant will be the upcoming August payroll report.
  The chart below ignores these other factors and offers up the odds of 
 further easing in September based on the base case that Bernanke’s  
primary concern is the state of the US labor market. July’s 8.3% unemployment rate and payroll gain of 163k put current odds of further easing at 45%.
The
 odds of Fed easing at the September FOMC meeting seem close to 50-50  
(with both sides vehemently talking their books - Fed officials and  
equity managers alike). Recent data has been a bit better: payrolls,  
claims, retail sales, and industrial production. As UBS' Drew Matus  
notes, other factors that will play a role include the ISM report,  
claims reports, and 'fiscal cliff'-related events. However, the primary determinant will be the upcoming August payroll report.
  The chart below ignores these other factors and offers up the odds of 
 further easing in September based on the base case that Bernanke’s  
primary concern is the state of the US labor market. July’s 8.3% unemployment rate and payroll gain of 163k put current odds of further easing at 45%. 
 
 
 
 If
 you haven’t heard yet, the committee which is drafting the  
platform for next week’s US Republican National Convention has announced
  that they are including a proposal to return to the gold standard.
 Big  news. Remember, a gold standard is a monetary system in which  
individual currency units are fixed to an amount of gold held by the  
government; under a gold standard, the paper money supply cannot be  
expanded without also increasing the amount of gold on hand. At 
present, the market value of the federal government’s gold holdings only
 amounts to about $250 billion which constitutes a mere 2.5% of US money
 supply. Clearly one of the key risks in this scenario is that 
the US  government would need to acquire as much gold as they can get 
their  hands on, likely through Roosewellian-style gold confiscation, 
and if so - the safest place for your gold is going to be a snug 
safety deposit box in a place like Hong Kong or Singapore.
If
 you haven’t heard yet, the committee which is drafting the  
platform for next week’s US Republican National Convention has announced
  that they are including a proposal to return to the gold standard.
 Big  news. Remember, a gold standard is a monetary system in which  
individual currency units are fixed to an amount of gold held by the  
government; under a gold standard, the paper money supply cannot be  
expanded without also increasing the amount of gold on hand. At 
present, the market value of the federal government’s gold holdings only
 amounts to about $250 billion which constitutes a mere 2.5% of US money
 supply. Clearly one of the key risks in this scenario is that 
the US  government would need to acquire as much gold as they can get 
their  hands on, likely through Roosewellian-style gold confiscation, 
and if so - the safest place for your gold is going to be a snug 
safety deposit box in a place like Hong Kong or Singapore.
 With
 the polls apparently seeing it all tied up at 46-46 (and heading  into 
the period when McCain and Obama diverged so strongly in 2008), a  
recent Gallup poll brings up the age-old question of whether the  
electorate will vote with their hearts or their wallets. Only in a  
Facebook-world; but 54% 'like' Obama versus 31% 'like' Romney but this huge social-network-factor disappears when asked who will better handle the economy - 52% believe Romney will be better for the economy as opposed to 43% believing in Obama. Of course none of that matters if the market remains up here.
With
 the polls apparently seeing it all tied up at 46-46 (and heading  into 
the period when McCain and Obama diverged so strongly in 2008), a  
recent Gallup poll brings up the age-old question of whether the  
electorate will vote with their hearts or their wallets. Only in a  
Facebook-world; but 54% 'like' Obama versus 31% 'like' Romney but this huge social-network-factor disappears when asked who will better handle the economy - 52% believe Romney will be better for the economy as opposed to 43% believing in Obama. Of course none of that matters if the market remains up here.
 Debt
 offers a compelling fantasy: there is no need for difficult  trade-offs
 or sacrifices, everything can be bought and enjoyed now. If income is flat and interest rates already near zero, then where is the leverage for additional debt going to come from?  The answer is the game of relying on ever-expanding debt is over.
 You can claim phantom assets and income streams as collateral for a  
while, but eventually the market sniffs out reality, and the phantom  
assets settle at their real value near zero. Once the collateral is  
gone, the debt is also revalued at zero, and the debtor is unable to  
borrow more. This is the position Greece finds itself in; the collateral
 and income  steams have been discounted, the credit lines have been 
pulled, and so  the reality of living within one's means is reasserting 
itself. Living  within one's income (household or national income) 
requires making  difficult trade-offs and sacrfices: either current 
consumption is  sacrificed for future benefits, or the future benefits 
are sacrificed  for current consumption. You can't have it both ways once the collateral  and credit both vanish.
Debt
 offers a compelling fantasy: there is no need for difficult  trade-offs
 or sacrifices, everything can be bought and enjoyed now. If income is flat and interest rates already near zero, then where is the leverage for additional debt going to come from?  The answer is the game of relying on ever-expanding debt is over.
 You can claim phantom assets and income streams as collateral for a  
while, but eventually the market sniffs out reality, and the phantom  
assets settle at their real value near zero. Once the collateral is  
gone, the debt is also revalued at zero, and the debtor is unable to  
borrow more. This is the position Greece finds itself in; the collateral
 and income  steams have been discounted, the credit lines have been 
pulled, and so  the reality of living within one's means is reasserting 
itself. Living  within one's income (household or national income) 
requires making  difficult trade-offs and sacrfices: either current 
consumption is  sacrificed for future benefits, or the future benefits 
are sacrificed  for current consumption. You can't have it both ways once the collateral  and credit both vanish.  
 
 Bloomberg has run a story,  citing two anonymous central bank officials, stating the ECB may not be  ready to finalise its plan to buy government bonds at the September 6th  meeting.
 JPMorgan's European economists note that the story cites two  reasons 
for this: (a) The Governing Council wish to wait until they have  seen 
the German constitutional court ruling on September 12th before  
proceeding; and (b) The programme is still being worked on staff may not
  be able to finalize it by then. Critically, JPM, like us, regard (a) 
as  something of a smokescreen. The idea that work “is 
not complete” may also be a euphemism for the  fact agreement on the 
contours of the policy is proving elusive - which in turn contributes to
 the sense that opinion on the Governing Council is deeply  divided, and hence its commitment to any policy intervening in markets  will not run deep. That could undermine the effectiveness of  policy interventions
 themselves - and no matter how many rumors you hear, you should focus 
on what you DO know - that a decision is delayed - and everything else 
is as useful as a personal guarantee from Samaras.
Bloomberg has run a story,  citing two anonymous central bank officials, stating the ECB may not be  ready to finalise its plan to buy government bonds at the September 6th  meeting.
 JPMorgan's European economists note that the story cites two  reasons 
for this: (a) The Governing Council wish to wait until they have  seen 
the German constitutional court ruling on September 12th before  
proceeding; and (b) The programme is still being worked on staff may not
  be able to finalize it by then. Critically, JPM, like us, regard (a) 
as  something of a smokescreen. The idea that work “is 
not complete” may also be a euphemism for the  fact agreement on the 
contours of the policy is proving elusive - which in turn contributes to
 the sense that opinion on the Governing Council is deeply  divided, and hence its commitment to any policy intervening in markets  will not run deep. That could undermine the effectiveness of  policy interventions
 themselves - and no matter how many rumors you hear, you should focus 
on what you DO know - that a decision is delayed - and everything else 
is as useful as a personal guarantee from Samaras.
Donations will help maintain and defray the operational costs. Paypal, a leading provider of secure 
online money transfers, will handle the donations. Thank you for your 
contribution. 
I'm PayPal Verified
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment