by Christina Sarich, Natural Society:
For
how long will we need to go back and forth in this GMO battle before a
sound conclusion is finally met? If you have been following the GMO
debate at all, you probably realize that this issue will likely never
rest, as numerous studies on both sides of the spectrum (one side
showing safety and the other showing danger) will continue to surface.
What’s more, this research as well as opinions will be born out of lies
or false substantiation. You’ve likely read headlines like these lately
and scoffed:
Read More @ NaturalSociety.com
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ecadc/ecadc9ee6eefc64b1fc80a3db932ba3c1267b1ae" alt=""
- 2000+ Reasons Why GMOs Are Safe To Eat And Environmentally Sustainable
- GMO Opponents Are the Climate Skeptics of the Left
- Study of 1 Billion Animals Finds GMOs Safe
Read More @ NaturalSociety.com
by Dean Garrison, DC Clothesline:
This is why my good friends at Fellowship of the Minds call him President Lucifer…
Calling him President Obola is racist, according to the libs, but if the shoe fits…
There simply are not words strong enough to explain who this man really is.
It is no secret that America’s handling of the current Ebola crisis has left something to be desired. The Obama Administration refuses to take even the simplest steps of banning flights to and from Ebola hot zones. There are no protocols in place and American hospitals are not prepared to deal with the problem.
Read More @ DCclothesline.com
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d02cc/d02ccd575abe9fa9bc5a05b7f7ceec72ee738279" alt=""
This is why my good friends at Fellowship of the Minds call him President Lucifer…
Calling him President Obola is racist, according to the libs, but if the shoe fits…
There simply are not words strong enough to explain who this man really is.
It is no secret that America’s handling of the current Ebola crisis has left something to be desired. The Obama Administration refuses to take even the simplest steps of banning flights to and from Ebola hot zones. There are no protocols in place and American hospitals are not prepared to deal with the problem.
Read More @ DCclothesline.com
by J. D. Heyes, Natural News:
Nearly 15 years ago, European and African scientists knew that the
Ebola virus could infect a person without them knowing about it, meaning
they can walk around with the virus in their system and never show any
symptoms.
In 2000, The New York Times (archived here), cited the findings of a study published in a prestigious medical journal, reporting:
The possibility of asymptomatic infection was only suggested in earlier studies, they said in last week’s issue of The Lancet, a medical journal published in London. Now they said they had documented such infections for the first time. They found that the Ebola virus could persist in the blood of asymptomatic infected individuals for two weeks after they were first exposed to an infected individual. How much longer the virus can persist is unknown.
Read More @ NaturalNews.com
by Michael Snyder, The Economic Collapse Blog:
Mark this day on your calendars. The Dow is at 16974, the S&P 500
is at 1982 and the NASDAQ is at 4549. From this day forward, we will
be looking to see how the stock market performs without the monetary
heroin that the Federal Reserve has been providing to it. Since
November 2008, the Fed has created about 3.5 trillion dollars and pumped
it into the financial system. An excellent chart illustrating this in
graphic format can be found right here.
Pretty much everyone agrees that this has been a tremendous boon for
the financial markets. As you will see below, even former Fed chairman
Alan Greenspan says that quantitative easing was “a terrific success” as
far as boosting stock prices. But he also says that QE has not been
very helpful to the real economy at all. In essence, the entire
quantitative easing program was a massive 3.5 trillion dollar gift to
Wall Street. If that sounds unfair to you, that is because it is
unfair.
Read More…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92198/9219822832878878632ba23b8ed6ef263344b298" alt=""
In 2000, The New York Times (archived here), cited the findings of a study published in a prestigious medical journal, reporting:
The possibility of asymptomatic infection was only suggested in earlier studies, they said in last week’s issue of The Lancet, a medical journal published in London. Now they said they had documented such infections for the first time. They found that the Ebola virus could persist in the blood of asymptomatic infected individuals for two weeks after they were first exposed to an infected individual. How much longer the virus can persist is unknown.
Read More @ NaturalNews.com
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b7bd/9b7bdd524e5a5c8c56f7cf080bace8798e2de8aa" alt=""
Read More…
by Joe Wright, Activist Post:
Public outrage about the global spy network continues to be ignored as
corporations and governments announce open partnerships in harvesting
all of our data. Social media is one particular playground for data
brokers who feast upon the information we “willingly” provide.
I reported recently about Twitter’s ChatterGrabber program that is “used to monitor tickborne diseases, such as Lyme disease, public sentiment involving vaccines, and gun violence and terrorism, serving as an early warning system for public health officials through suspicious tweets or conversations.” That story was followed shortly after by the announcement that Twitter would open up its entire database to MIT beginning with its very first Tweet in 2006. We know that Facebook has used their algorithms to go beyond surveillance and actually manipulate the emotions of users as a type of psychology experiment. The “Truthy” study, funded by the National Science Foundation, directly targets political speech: One focus is the spread of “political smears, astroturfing, misinformation, and other social pollution.” Even a Republican member of the FCC said that it was a program right out of a George Orwell novel.
No matter – now tech behemoth IBM has its sights set on Twitter.
Read More @ Activist Post
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/512bd/512bd3d3403492e8820d3d55dd0ace4ae41b3da0" alt=""
I reported recently about Twitter’s ChatterGrabber program that is “used to monitor tickborne diseases, such as Lyme disease, public sentiment involving vaccines, and gun violence and terrorism, serving as an early warning system for public health officials through suspicious tweets or conversations.” That story was followed shortly after by the announcement that Twitter would open up its entire database to MIT beginning with its very first Tweet in 2006. We know that Facebook has used their algorithms to go beyond surveillance and actually manipulate the emotions of users as a type of psychology experiment. The “Truthy” study, funded by the National Science Foundation, directly targets political speech: One focus is the spread of “political smears, astroturfing, misinformation, and other social pollution.” Even a Republican member of the FCC said that it was a program right out of a George Orwell novel.
No matter – now tech behemoth IBM has its sights set on Twitter.
Read More @ Activist Post
by Pam Martens and Russ Martens, Wall Street on Parade:
Back on June 25 of this year, Wall Street On Parade ran the following headline:
“BOE’s Carney: Inflated Central Bank Balance Sheet the New Normal;
Expect to Hear the Same Conclusion from the U.S. Fed.” The day before
our headline, Bank of England Governor, Mark Carney, had just explained
to Parliament why their central bank’s balance sheet, bloated through
quantitative easing, was not going to be shrinking anytime soon.
Carney: “…I would define – picking up on what my colleagues have said – pre-crisis position as a position that’s consistent with the normal course of liquidity requirements of the banking system…What has changed, to the good, in terms of the banking system here is that through regulation and supervision we have put much more responsibility on the banks themselves to hold liquidity to manage liquidity shocks. And, as a consequence of that, their demand for reserves can be expected to be higher. The further consequence of that is that the balance sheet of the Bank of England will be larger…”
Translation: We have no idea how to unwind this mess any better than the Americans do.
Read More @ WallStreetonParade.com
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e78df/e78dfdb9d699a08125a923f89c5ed264d7c77b88" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab5b2/ab5b223ca86fb5c9d9e57ccd74de6da786221fbe" alt=""
Carney: “…I would define – picking up on what my colleagues have said – pre-crisis position as a position that’s consistent with the normal course of liquidity requirements of the banking system…What has changed, to the good, in terms of the banking system here is that through regulation and supervision we have put much more responsibility on the banks themselves to hold liquidity to manage liquidity shocks. And, as a consequence of that, their demand for reserves can be expected to be higher. The further consequence of that is that the balance sheet of the Bank of England will be larger…”
Translation: We have no idea how to unwind this mess any better than the Americans do.
Read More @ WallStreetonParade.com
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e78df/e78dfdb9d699a08125a923f89c5ed264d7c77b88" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment