Once again Zero Hedge is just a week or so ahead of the "experts."
 A week ago, in a post titled "April Vehicle Assembly Rate Collapses, May Industrial Production Estimates To Be Cut" we concluded "
Expect to see drastic downward cuts to May Industrial Production and next, to Q2 GDP." Enter JPMorgan's Michael Feroli with "Motor vehicle sector to drag on Q2 growth." Full text: "
We are revising down our outlook for the annual growth rate of real GDP in Q2 from 3.0% to 2.5%. The  main factor behind our revision is weaker output of the motor vehicle  sector. Based on industry data we project that real output in this  sector will decline at around a 20% annual rate, which would subtract  0.5%-point from GDP growth. From an expenditure category perspective, we  see most of this weaker output making itself felt in a softer pace of  inventory accumulation (with some offset though weaker imports). A  portion of this shortfall reflects supply chain disruptions associated  with the Tohoku earthquake. Anticipating a fading of those disruptions,  auto production schedules look for a rebound in output in the third  quarter, which, along with somewhat lower gasoline prices, supports the  case for an acceleration in growth next quarter to 3%. The change to our  second quarter growth forecast is modest enough not to have a  significant impact on our projections for labor markets or inflation. We  continue to anticipate a first Fed rate hike in 13Q1." Next up: Goldman  revising their Q2-4 GDP "hockeystick" to be more reminiscent of a  "baseball bat."

The  fact that the US is at the debt ceiling, and every incremental dollar  of debt issued has to be met with a comparable underfunding in  retirement funds is not bothering the SecTres  (at least until August 2  at which point all mechanisms to delay the ceiling breach expire). Which  is why today's auction of 2 Year paper passed with barely a glitch: $35  billion (CUSIP QZ6) priced at 0.56% (89.7% allotted at high), the  lowest yield since December 2010. The Bid To Cover was a sizable jump to  recent auctions, coming at 3.46, nearly half a turn higher than last  auction's 3.06, and higher than the LTM average of 3.38. Not  surprisingly, at 31.29% Indirect interest was the lowest since January,  as foreign central banks and investors are dealing with tightening  concerns of their own, meaning the bulk of the auction went to Primary  Dealers (half) and the balance to Direct Dealers, who took down a 2011  high of 19.15%. The direct bidder hit rate was a surprisingly solid  32.22%. Nonetheless, with the WI trading almost on top of the auction  High Yield, there were no surprise in the short-end of the bond market,  where investors once again are forced to look ever further right for any  yield, as short-term rates have plunged to lows last seen just when the  equity market was about to flip over (not to mention the quirks  currently in the money market funds which has snagged the shadow economy  rather bad since the FDIC fee assessment was imposed). 
With the topic of oil once again dominating  the air waves courtesy of Goldman's most recent flip flop on Brent, we  look at one of those thing that few if any have actually done much  analysis on over the past decade, namely supply and demand. As it is no  secret that the primary driver in price formation of virtually all  commodities has been excess liquidity, the actual fundamentals have been  drowned for a long time. Yet they still remain. Of all "demand  fundamentals", the biggest one is and will be China. Should the world  indeed proceed to tighten across the globe, the question of Chinese  demand will increasingly become one of substantial importance. Here is  how Platts sees Chinese oil demand in the next several years: "China's  demand for oil will grow 4-5% a year to hit 530 million-560 million mt (10.6 million b/d-11.3 million b/d) in 2015, with transport  fuel and chemical feedstocks driving the increase, a senior Chinese  researcher said Wednesday." Platts estimates that China's current oil consumption  is about 450 million mts, a 12.2% increase over the past year. And  following 2015, "Growth will then slow to 2%-3% a year, to reach 590  million-650 million mt by 2020, said Liu Xiao Li of the Energy Research Institute, part of China's economic planning agency, the National Development and Reform Commission. With oil production in 2020 expected to be 200 million-230  million mt, 
that would imply an import dependence of around 65%, she added."  One can thus see why China is ever so cautious proceeding to procure  E&P exposure and infrastructure projects around the world: the  country realizes that without a friendly foreign "import" base, there is  no way it can grow into its energy demand. Lastly, for those who  collect parity facts, "in a presentation at the International Air  Transport Association's Aviation Fuel Forum, Standard Chartered Bank said China  would overtake Europe as the world's second largest consumer of oil before  2020, with around 13 million-14 million b/d of demand. 
The bank's data indicates China would catch up with the US sometime after 2030. Standard Chartered's data has China's oil demand approaching 17 million b/d around that year and still rising, with US oil demand around 18 million b/d and falling." Luckily by then we should have far  more evidence whether the Peak Oil theory is indeed true, in which case  the world will have far greater problems in the next 19 years than  anything seen to date.
Submitted by Tyler Durden on  05/24/2011 12:16 -0400
The S&P 500 is no higher now than it was on February 7. Yet, so many pundits still believe we are in a flaming bull market.
QE2 failed to provide for a sustained acceleration in the pace of economic activity.
The housing inventory background is horrible
Over half of the NYSE is now trading below its 50-day moving average (thanks to Richard Russell).
M3  has fallen at a 1.5% annual rate since QE2 started (thanks to CLSA's  Russell Napier); in other words, credit is still not being created.
The  Nasdaq is the first of the major averages to have broken below both the  100-day and 50-day moving averages. The Dow and S&P 500 have so far  just pierced the former, but we all know the Nasdaq is a leading  indicator. As an aside, in the last 12 months the Dow has broken below  its 50-day moving average three times and from that point to the interim  bottom, we saw the Dow plummet 4.5%.
...And much more
No comments:
Post a Comment