The Coming Economic Collapse, Currency Induced Cost Push Inflation/Hyperinflation, Weimar Germany, Euro Collapse,
Zimbabwe Hyperinflation, Survival in Economic Collapse, World Economic Collapse, Dollar Collapse,
What Would Happen If the Economy Collapsed,The Coming Economic Depression.
Gold and Silver Will Protect Your Wealth.
Ron
Paul has another illustrious supporter - Jim Rogers. The Quantum fund
co-founder, who has been spot on about pretty much everything for the
past 3 years (see Roubini Versus Rogers Is Right Debate for 2010:
Investor Jim Rogers thinks gold will double to at least $2,000 an
ounce. Economist Nouriel Roubini says that’s “utter nonsense.” As these
well-known market personalities duke it out, they’re doing us a favor
by highlighting a critical debate: Which is the bigger threat --
inflation or deflation?), not to mention gold (to the amusement of such
Keynesian soundbites recorded for posterity as the following: "Maybe it will reach $1,100 or so but $1,500 or $2,000 is nonsense"),
and especially inflation (perhaps the only thing that will prompt a
chuckle out of Gadaffi and Mubarak these days is someone telling them
that their multi-decade reigns are over due to hyperdeflation and
plunging food prices), was caught on tape voicing his endorsement of the
only sane person who can possibly do something for this country. "In
this election if Ron Paul gets anywhere near the nomination I would
certainly support him. He is the only one that I've seen in American
politics that seems to have a clue about what's going on." Zero Hedge agrees on all counts.
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 08/27/2011 - 14:46Ben BernankeCapital MarketsCDSEurozoneFranceGermanyGross Domestic ProductInternational Monetary FundItalyLehmanLehman BrothersMorgan StanleyPrimary MarketReutersUnemploymentVigilantes
This year's biggest winner from the botched DSK affair has been
France's Christine Lagarde, who despite the dropping of all charges
against the former head, is now in charge of the IMF. We admit that the
ascension of Lagarde to the throne of the world's most irrelevant
global bailout organization (what the IMF "does" is of not importance:
the only thing that matters is who Beijing, and Chinabot, feels like
rescuing today) happened even though we previously predicted that
Germany would be very much against it. Well, Germany let it slide, and
endorsed Lagarde. That may soon change though, after the former finance
minister essentially threw the entire European (read French, Swiss and
German whose assets as a % of host GDP are ridiculous... yes, a technical term) financial system under the bus at Jackson Hole, a day after Bernanke said to wait until September 20 for QE3 clarity. Per Bloomberg:
"Bolstering banks’ balance sheets “is key to cutting the chains of
contagion,” Lagarde said today in the text of remarks at the Federal
Reserve’s annual forum in Jackson Hole, Wyoming. Without an “urgent”
recapitalization, “we could easily see the further spread of economic
weakness to core countries, or even a debilitating liquidity crisis."
Lagarde, a former French finance minister who took the helm at the
Washington-based IMF in July, said recapitalization should be “substantial.” Banks should look for funds in the markets first and seek public funds if necessary. One way to provide capital could be through the European bailout fund, she said."
And now, one can see why Germany is fuming: not only will Germany soon
have no choice but to fund the EFSF's sovereign bailout ration all on
its own, which as we, and other have speculated,
could be as large as €3.5 trillion (or about $5 trillion), but it will
be Germany's duty to also fund the rescue of all banks on a parallel
track. What is the additional tally? Why at least $230 billion in
European alone. Then again, when you get to $5 trillion, what's a few
hundred billions between friends?
The Fed’s tools (QE and otherwise) are now going to be implemented to
“avert catastrophe,” NOT to “improve the economy.” The bulls don’t want
to hear this but it’s true. The game has changed...
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 08/26/2011 - 23:38Bank of AmericaBank of AmericaBen BernankeDollar DestructionEuroDollarFederal ReserveGuest PostMonetary PolicyRepo MarketReverse RepoUnemployment
Bernanke said QE 3.0, without really saying it. The markets, seeing
the enlarged schedule for the September meeting and interpreting the
likelihood of heavy discussions, have gotten the message. Stocks threw
off the daily mortal struggle that is life as Bank of America and bid
for the QE future that is now September (good riddance to August
apparently). Gold prices followed on those expectations of a resumption
to the willful and wanton dollar destruction that QE purely represents.
If the Chairman can influence a major market rally without ever having
to face the growing dissent within the FOMC ranks, then his speech has
proven to be a stroke of genius. That is the essence of rational
expectations, making others believe you have magical powers so that they
do your bidding without any actual work or direct engagement on your
part. But there is a huge downside to waiting, and Bernanke knows it.
The financial crisis grows while the economy is sliding further into
contraction. Time is not on his side. So why does he wait? Simple,
Bernanke and QE is in a box – conditions currently in the wholesale
money markets, especially the repo market, will not suffer more QE. As
the unsecured Fed funds and eurodollar markets have effectively frozen
for banks outside the primary dealer network, wholesale funding has
been left to repos. However, there is already a shortage of treasury
bills, the prime, vital collateral of nearly all post-2008 repo funding
arrangements.
Some
perspectives on the one event that has consumed everyone on the East
Coast from CNN: "Hurricane Irene continues to crawl north after making
landfall Saturday morning in North Carolina. The storm is expected to
head up the East Coast from Virginia to Maine, bringing hurricane-force
winds, heavy rain, flooding and widespread power outages. President
Barack Obama warned that Irene could be a "hurricane of historic
proportions."
Anthony Wile
The meme of his ineffable wisdom is established yet again. What the free markets have undone, government can ravel.
This is the value of Ben Bernanke, a shill for Money Power. He is
trotted out like the proverbial potted plant to make right statist
noises, to verbalize the statist nostrums that will then be elaborated
on by the manipulated media of the mainstream. The goal is to keep
people believing in the system until world government is established.
It is harder and harder, of course. The Internet Reformation carries
on apace, informing people of the futility of government solutions to
private problems. This is a tremendous problem for the power elite that
is deathly afraid of losing its grip over central banking – the ability
to print money from nothing to fund its various depredations, anything
from "green growth" to serial wars and scarcity promotions (food, water,
etc.)
This is the war in which Ben Bernanke has enlisted. It is his job to
make people believe in government. Of course, it is never enunciated in
this fashion. Bernanke is supposed to be a prime exponent of free
markets and private sector competition. As usual when it comes to the
mainstream, Bernanke's actual function is entirely opposite to his REAL
task. Read More
Lew Rockwell
It should be obvious to everyone but the most dedicated
adherent of Keynesianism that the stimulus did not accomplish its end.
The combination of outright spending by Congress, the desperate schemes
to reflate the housing market, the attempt to transfuse bleeding firms
with other people's money, and the creation of trillions in artificial
money, has not done a thing to lift the US economy.
Actually, the reverse has been true. All these efforts have prevented
the adjustment of economic forces to the post-boom world. And all the
resources that the stimulus consumed were extracted from the private
sector, for we must always remember that government has no resources of
its own. Everything it does must come from the hides of private
producers and the citizenry in general, in the future if not
immediately.
It's tedious that we had to learn this lesson yet again, for it was
only 38 years ago that we experienced yet another collapse of the
Keynesian paradigm. The color of the theory was a bit different in those
days. The fine-tuning operations of the government were supposed to
operate according to a fixed model in which there was a tradeoff between
inflation and recessionary unemployment. If unemployment got too high
due to slow economic growth, their solution was said to be simple:
reflate and deal with the costs. If unemployment then became too low in
recovery – leading to an "overheating," as the parlance of the time put
it, the answer was to deflate. Read More
No comments:
Post a Comment