This is what happens when Wall Street protesters 
organize to the extent that they can actually effect the banks the same 
way the corporate raiders control the Fortune 500. 

Yes, outflows in domestic equities may be traditionally perceived as a
  contrarian signal, but when they hit 23 out of 24 weeks for a total of
  $106 billion (and the one weekly inflow was $715 million) one has to  
start getting concerned about the cash levels of the broader mutual fund
  space which as had been pointed out recently are already at all time  
lows. In the week ended October 5, domestic equity funds saw an outflow 
 of $4.3 billion, which brings total 2011 outflows to a total of $93  
billion. What was just as notable about the week is that while  
traditionally we have seen rotation from equity assets into fixed  
income, in the past week a whopping $6.2 billion was withdrawn from  
taxable bond funds as well, implying that the ever increasing volatility
  not only means retail has thrown in the towel on stocks but that the  
already painfully low yields in bonds are forcing the long-term  
investors to get out of the market in its entirety.
There  are few opinions in the middle regarding the China story. 
People are  either convinced China is a juggernaut that can’t be stopped
 and will  become the dominant world power (a recent, global Pew Poll 
found that  47% of respondents think China is or will be the dominant 
global power),  or they see a colossal bubble that will burst and cause 
worldwide  mayhem. While some might think my world-view has a negative 
slant, I  tend toward what I think is healthy skepticism that causes me 
to view  things in a more realistic manner. Based on the facts as I  
understand them, the Chinese government has created a commercial and  
residential real estate bubble in an effort to keep peasants employed  
and not rioting in the streets. In the case of the US subprime mortgage 
 bubble, critical thinkers like Steve Eisman and Michael Burry figured  
out it was a bubble three years before it burst. Jim Chanos and Andy Xei
  have been warning about this Chinese bubble for over a year. They have
  been scorned by the same Wall Street shills who denied the US housing 
 bubble. As Eisman and Burry proved (reaping billions), just because you
  are early doesn’t mean you are wrong.
In a piece of news that can not be taken well by students of Dr. 
Copper,  the FT reveals for the first time that China's estimated copper
  inventories, based on numbers from the China Non-Ferrous Metals 
Industry  Association, were 1.9 million tonnes at the end of 2010 which 
is almost  double the lower end of the consensus estimate of 1.0-1.5 MM 
tonnes  (and, as the FT points out, "more than the US consumes in a 
year). So  while copper is doing its high beta thing on the n
th
 short  squeeze day in stocks, the smart money is starting to bail for 
very  obvious reasons. And if the reasons are not obvious, this means 
that  "The estimates, which were announced at a recent meeting of the  
International Copper Study Group but have not been made public, imply  
that real Chinese copper demand may have been lower than thought in  
recent years." In other words, and to all who are still confused by why 
 Zero Hedge jokes at each and every iteration of economic growth driven 
 by "inventory stockpiling", this is nothing other than trying to do at 
 the national level, what Goldman and JPM do at the LME level each and  
every day: hoard and sell, only in China's case it is more hoard and  
forget. Alas, when China itself is the only real marginal buyer (not to 
 mention that millions of domestic businesses operate using Letters of  
Credit backed by copper), things get very, very ugly, and explains why  
China has been so secretive about this number.
Philly Fed dissenter and rebel Charles Plosser, said something stunning 
during
   a Q&A session at the Zell/Lurie Real Estate Center at Wharton.  
When  asked what he thought of Operation Twist, his response: "it is fiscal, not monetary policy, and does not have much credibility ....Treasury
   debt issuance could undo much of the effect of the Fed's attempt to  
 lower borrowing costs, known as 'Operation Twist', Plosser said. "It   
doesn't have a whole lot of credibility attached to it." While we have  
 no doubt that Twist has no credibility and both the Fed and the market 
  will figure this weakest link out within a month, forcing the Fed to  
 proceed, over the 3 dissenters pseudo-dead bodies, with much more LSAP,
   it is somewhat shocking to hear confirmation that the Fed itself now
   sees its duties as those of the legislative, or the body tasked with 
  writing America's laws and funding required amounts of money via debt 
  issuance. Granted, it is well known that America's congress is now in a
   state of perpetual impasse with no further stimulus likely to come as
   long as the GOP controls the Congress and Obama is president. But at 
  least the American people (deserving as they are of their   
representatives and president) pick those in congress. 
  The last time we checked, the "popular election" of the Fed chairman 
is   not in the purvey of the US constitution, and the only capacity 
given   to public representatives is to veto his nomination. Everything 
else is   decided in a banker-filled conclave. Which then begs the 
question: has   the Fed admitted the archaic concept of the US republic 
is now over  and  done with?
That there are theories (and facts) blasting manipulation by various 
 central banks to supress the price of gold over the years is not a  
secret to anyone (which incidentally is good for anyone who wishes to  
purchase gold at cheaper price, but that is the topic for another day). 
 Yet one "conspiracy" we had not heard of until now is that America is  
actively doing what it can to send gold higher. That is no longer the  
case. A few days ago, none other than the capo di tutti Mexican cappi,  
Iran president Mahmoud Ahmedinejad, proclaimed that "Iran's enemies were
  deliberately causing the price of gold and foreign exchange to rise in
 a  bid to undermine the Islamic Republic's economy. "The enemies and  
ill-wishers want to make a fuss and present wrong information to provoke
  and deviate the market." The plot thickens. 
From Reuters: "
In order to disturb the market they buy a lot of gold coins with their huge amount of money ...
  they do the same in the foreign exchange market. But we have got 
enough  reserves to meet all the country's needs." And there you have 
it:  America is willing to risk the reserve status of its currency and 
send  everyone chasing after gold simply so it can destabilize the 
Iranian  economy... And now we've heard it all.
It appears Operation Twist was not enough for all...
- SOME FED OFFICIALS SOUGHT TO RETAIN OPTION OF QE3, MINUTES SAY
- SOME FED OFFICIALS SAW QE3 AS 'MORE POTENT TOOL' TO SPUR GROWTH.
- TWO FOMC MEMBERS FAVORED `STRONGER POLICY ACTION' LAST MONTH
Remember Golidlocks:
- MANY FOMC MEMBERS SAID INFLATION RISKS `WERE ROUGHLY BALANCED'
- FOMC MEMBERS SAW `RELATIVELY LITTLE RISK OF DEFLATION'
- 4:05: “Direct help for bank recapitalization from EFSF is not at all doable” – German Economy Minister (Translation: “Frogs, I thought we told you already, your plan doesn’t fly”)
- 6:00: “It is important to us that all banks are equipped for all  
eventualities and must go to market first for capital” – German Finance 
 Minister (Translation: “May be they’ll understand if I say it – nobody seems to take Roesler serious”)
- 6:19: “There is no doubt on the soundness of French banks” – French government (Translation: “Hopefully the dim-wits at Agence France-Presse will print my statement without embarrassing typos”)
etc.

Today's $21 billion 
10 Year reopening was
  not pretty. First, the tail was a notable 3 bps with the When Issued  
trading at 2.24%, ahead of the auction pricing a disappointing 2.27%,  
well above the record low 2.00% from September, although still  
materially lower than average yields in the past year. As troubling was 
 the Bid To Cover which came at 2.86 or the lowest since November 2010's
  2.80 (compared to the LTM 3.10). Then looking at the internals should 
be  a cause of concern for anyone who believes that China will not  
retaliate for the currency bill passed yesterday by Congress, after  
Indirects took down just 35.0% of the full $21 billion, the lowest since
  February 2010, at a 81% hit rate. Directs also showed very little  
interest in the bond taking down only 6.4% compared to an LTM average of
  10.7% (and the previous 11%). Who was the savior? The recently 
expanded  Primary Dealers of course, which took down 58.5, the most 
since May  2009. Overall, an ugly auction although whether the reason 
for the weak  demand is due to inflation expectations returning, or a 
capital  reallocation from bonds into other assets, is for now unknown.
Maybe the moment we should be trying to avoid is the one that allows 
weak institutions to exist.  The weak institutions do not provide loans 
because they are too afraid of losses since they mainly survive by the 
good grace (and money) from governments at central banks.  That is bad 
enough, but they crowd out new money.  Who is going to go after markets 
where even a sleepy BAC could briefly wake up and crush you before you 
ever got started.  I have heard of some interesting companies out there 
trying to provide loans to those who need them, but they can’t get any 
traction.  Too Big To Fail aren’t too sleepy to allow potential 
competitors to grow. Stocks can rally.  Lehman Moment can be said 500 
times today.  Every politician can worry about the impact of triggering 
CDS.  Every banker can claim the world would end if they are made to pay
 for their bad decisions.  In the end, Iceland and Ireland both improved
 only AFTER they let banks fail.  The US, for all the talk about Lehman,
 is only doing worse than that since it decided banks couldn’t be 
allowed to fail.  
I know that America’s politicians and crackerjack team of  central 
bankers don’t see any signs of ‘non-transitory’ inflation, but  anyone 
who has been to the doctor or written a check for an insurance  policy 
knows otherwise. Hey, they’re on government health plans anyways,  how 
could they know? The increase is usually in the ballpark of 10% to 20%. 
It’s crazy to  think about the thousands of dollars each year that go 
out the door on a  plan that I never use, all so that I don’t get stuck 
with a $200,000  emergency room bill in case of some highly improbable 
event. It makes no  rational economic sense. In every other country that
 I travel to, I don’t have any insurance.  If I go to the doctor, I pay 
cash. If I go to the emergency room (and  it’s happened quite a few 
times), I pay cash. This is one of the great  things about travel and 
living overseas– healthcare is usually quite  reasonable, often 
downright cheap.
While we understand the motive of Greeks to cripple the financial 
nerve  center of the country by effectively immobilizing the finance 
ministry  and subjecting the country to a 
9 day shutdown, we
  are yet to witness the ingenuity of the people, when angry, to  
completely lock down the country's financial apparatus, especially when 
 it comes to the revenue side of the ledger. Behold the latest reason 
why  the next time the Troika does its paper napkin "assessment" of the 
 Greek deficit to GDP it will be double digits, and have a 2 handle.
While it won't say much new to those "stupid enough" to exist in the 
 intersection of the "Retired" and "Alive" Venn circles under the  
Bernanke central planning regime, we suggest any pensioners who hope to 
 see their life savings generate some...any... return (
on capital, or 
of
 capital) in their lifetime, to simply skip this article and read some  
of our cheerier fare. So here is the punchline for pension fund managers
  which now predict an utterly 
insane 11% equity return which is the only thing that would make their Pension Plans whole: "
In
 the early nineties, plan sponsors,  if biased in their forecast, were 
generally biased toward conservatism.  From 1997 through 2007, 
expectations, although a bit rosy at times, were  largely within the 
realm of reasonableness. In our view, a long-run  equity risk premium of
 11% is pure jibber-jabber. It is wishful  thinking. I dare not predict 
the level of the S&P 500 ten years out,  but an ERP this high 
suggests the S&P would have to reach  unprecedented levels. If this 
is what plan sponsors are counting on, I,  like Clubber Lang, predict 
Pain." And "Hope is  neither a training plan nor an investment strategy." Uh, wrong. Have you seen the EURUSD these days?
If you find useful information, please consider making a small donation, to help cover some of the labor and cost for this blog.
Thank You
I'm PayPal Verified 
       more »   
 
No comments:
Post a Comment