data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abc16/abc168b9d852db0cc156719950422de195c1ea5f" alt=""
We
will mince no words: Mr. Draghi has opened the door to hyperinflation.
There will probably not be hyperinflation because Germany would leave
the Euro zone first, but the door is open and we will explain why.
To avoid this outcome, assuming that in this context the Eurozone will continue to show fiscal deficits, we will also show that it is critical that the Fed does not raise interest rates.
This can only be extremely bullish of precious metals and commodities
in the long run. In the short-run, we will have to face the usual
manipulations in the precious metals markets and everyone will seek to
front run the European Central Bank, playing the sovereign yield curve
and being long banks’ stocks.
If in the short-run, the ECB is the lender of last resort, in the long run, it may become the borrower of first resort!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53a32/53a32a13e4ac203b56eed8aea065efca69de91ce" alt=""
It seems the ability to admit
defeat
a lack of omnipotence comes with retirement from the Fed. The volume of
truthiness from ex-Fed governors is growing and Mark Olson just
provided a very succinct summary of why he believes not only is the most
recent jobs number not a surprise to the Fed, but the market has
already priced in what the Fed could do. Olson sees the
odds of QE3 as 50-50 at best,
believes changes in the employment picture are rounding errors and not
driving Fed decisions on a tick by tick basis, and most critically he
notes that
"the Fed doesn't want to get into a position of is having to react because of the market anticipation."
No matter how much political pressure, the need to keep that QE powder
dry for when the stuff really hits the fan seems more prescient and
Olson provides color on the limits of Central Bankers as he notes the
effect of Fed actions as
"the only possible impact it would have would be psychological," and that
"they've
provided all the stimulus you can do with monetary policy in the
absence of anything happening with a better fiscal policy."
Bill Gross may be credited with inventing the term '
the New Normal', although his recommendation
to purchase gold above all other asset classes, something which only
fringe blogs such
as this one have been saying is the best trade (in terms of return,
Sharpe Ratio, and the ability to sleep soundly) for the past three and a
half years, he is sure to be increasingly ostracized by the
establishment, and told to take all his newfangled idioms with him in
his exile to
less than serious people land. Which takes us to
David Rosenberg, who today revisits his own definition of the New
Normal. And it, too, is just as applicable as that of the Pimco boss: "
The new normal is that the economy doesn't drive markets any more."
Short and sweet, although it also is up for debate whether the economy
ever drove the markets in the first place. But that would open up a
whole new conspiratorial can of worms, and is a discussion best saved
for after Ben Bernanke decides to save the "housing market" by buying
more hundreds of billions in MBS and lowering mortgage yields further,
even though mortgage rates already are at record lows (something that
mortgage applications apparently couldn't care less about
as we showed last week),
while "avoiding" to do everything in his power to boost the S&P,
which recently was at 5 year highs, and certainly "avoiding" to listen
to Chuck Schumer telling him to do his CTRL+P job, and "get to work"
guaranteeing Schumer's donors have another whopper of a bonus season.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f44d/0f44d8a507b1c5f3f759a8581b4f138718b11905" alt=""
The
almighty Dollar is looking less mighty these days. By almost every
measure, the purchasing power of the US Dollar is in precipitous
decline. The following infographic, whose contents should be well-known
to our readers, visualizes the sad state of affairs that the average
American seems to have ignored for far too long. And since the whole
world is now engaged in the 4th year of all out currency debasement one
can safely channel Lester Burnham and say it's "all downhill from
here."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac8f1/ac8f1f2c0e49aa4d134cdaad24e786043650e3e4" alt=""
It seems most have strong views on who should not be the Chairman of
the Fed but based on a recent survey at a Morgan Stanley conference, it
seems Ron Paul still has an outside chance. What of Justin Bieber? Jim
Grant? Maria Bartiromo? Chuck Norris?
Good
evening Ladies and Gentlemen:
Gold closed down today by $9.00 to $1728.70 as the bankers decided that a
mini raid was necessary as they had a look at the burgeoning OI
figures. Silver on the other hand only lost 7 cents to $33.57 as the
bankers are loathe to supply the necessary short paper.
Dave from Denver correctly states the shortfall of JPM with regard
silver:
"I just did a quick
Donations help maintain and defray the operational costs. Paypal, a leading provider of secure
online money transfers, will handle the donations. Thank you for your
contribution.
I'm PayPal Verified
(Note: for those unaware, my title is a play on F. Scott Fitzgerald's
quote: "Let me tell you about the very rich. They are different from you
and me.")
*We live in a self-entitled society and no sector is more self-entitled
than those who work for the Government, supported by taxpayers with
guaranteed salaries and pensions. Their sense of self-entitlement is worse
than that of the lumbering herd of overweight middle class houseswives who
drive around in their gas-guzzling, over-sized SUVs, running up credit card
debt and chatting on their cellphone the second they get into their c...
more »
The bull market in commodities will end some day – but some day is a long
way away. - *in CNBC*
Related: United States Oil Fund LP ETF (USO), SPDR Gold Trust ETF (GLD),
iShares Silver Trust ETF (SLV)
*Jim Rogers is an author, financial commentator and successful
international investor. He has been frequently featured in Time, The New
York Times, Barron’s, Forbes, Fortune, The Wall Street Journal, The
Financial Times and is a regular guest on Bloomberg and CNBC.*
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd504/cd5045cac206107ebea251d6dd33da74e863406c" alt=""
The
chart below shows 2050 years of relative global GDP, during which
there was a surprisingly flat distribution of the major economic
powers: China, India, and the "West", at least until the mid-1800s, when
the "Western" Golden Age began primarily courtesy of the industrial
revolution, followed by the arrival of the Fed and virtually endless
leverage (i.e., borrowing from the future until such time as no more
debt capacity remains at either the public or private sectors), only to
end in the late 1900s when the marginal balance of power shifted back
to Asia, which became the next nexus of debt accumulation (see our
earlier post on
The Great Recoupling for
some additional perspectives). And while the chart, from Deutsche Bank
and PWC, attempts to predict the next 40 years of relative GDP
distribution by eventually regressing back to the the long-term
trendline, we feel that this is quite an optimistic assumption for a
world in which virtually every "developed" country is insolvent, begs
for China to ease whenever western inflation sends gas prices soaring
making reelection of the incumbent impossible, and is reliant on the
indefinite continuation of the USD's reserve status to preserve the
last traces of western superiority (not to mention cheap funding of
$-trillion deficits as far as the eye can see).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62d2c/62d2cb1e8cb5f059e62c4a83eaa10c3285d07f00" alt=""
While the official number from the FMS is not out yet, according to
an advance look by the CBO, the August deficit soared from a modest $70
billion to a whopping $192 billion, the highest August deficit in
history, and coming at a time when traditionally the US Treasury does
not generate substantial deficits. It also means that "
that" $59 billion budget surplus in
April, coming after 42 straight months of deficits, and which
surprised so many, was just as we suspected, nothing but a play on the
temporal mismatch between treasury receipts and outlays. Most
importantly, with one month left in the fiscal year, a month which,
too, will likely come well above last year's $63 billion, the US has
now spent $1.165 trillion more than it has received via various taxes.
Finally so much for the year over year improvement: at $1.23 trillion
deficit in the LTM period, this is only 3.2% less than the August 2011
LTM deficit which was $1.27 trillion, despite nearly 2 million more
workers employed (at least according to the
BLS)
and generating tax revenue. Expect the US to end Fiscal 2012 with a
total deficit of well over $1.2 trillion, which in turn means that the
average burn rate of $100 billion in new debt issuance each month, will
continue into the indefinite future.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24ea8/24ea847f29118ece9bd2a00a6c764b727d6db93e" alt=""
Since
The Dreme (Draghi Scheme) began shortly after the EU Summit, the P/E
multiple on the S&P 500 has risen by a faith-defining 2x. This is
the
largest three-month rise in this indicator-of-indifference-to-reality since the initial burst rally off the March 2009 lows. Meanwhile, the actual earnings consensus is being marked down further, heading for an
earnings recession as we pointed out last week.
It seems investors are too afraid not to believe in P/E miracles or
perhaps it is just faith that central banks have it all under control
and their 'promises' are as good-as-gold.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/932bb/932bb9c38538f659eba569b0e136b2c3cf106e74" alt=""
One
of the deepest mysteries related to the ongoing rally in U.S. equities
is the persistent lack of retail investor involvement. QAs we have
vociferously noted, U.S. equity mutual fund flows remain solidly
negative and interest in single stock trading among individual investors
is similarly moribund - while corporate bond volumes remain flat and
Treasury volumes higher. As Nick Colas, of ConvergEx group, notes, one
missing link to explain this dichotomy must be the
fundamental lack of financial literacy among U.S. retail investors,
yet this relationship is seldom mentioned as a reason for this group’s
ongoing apathy in the face of 4-year highs for domestic stocks.
You might argue that “It was always thus…” and that is a fair point.
American investors haven’t grown dumber on financial matters in the
last decade; they never had the requisite knowledge to begin with. But
it does appear that the events of the
last few years have caused some kind of “Tipping point” with regard to investors’ ability to process the world around them.
SocGen’s Sebastian Galy:
The market decided rose tinted glasses were not enough, put on its dark shades and hit the nightlife.
And the uber-bullishness is based on what? Hopium. Hope that the Fed
will unleash QE3, or nominal GDP level targeting and buy, buy, buy —
because what the market really needs right now is more bond flippers,
right? Hope that Europeans have finally gotten their act together in
respect to buying up periphery debt to create a ceiling on borrowing
costs. Hope that this time is different in China, and that throwing a
huge splash of stimulus cash at infrastructure will soften the landing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03cab/03cab887a27ba849ee829f5786ed7b2a09049268" alt=""
The
chart below from UBS' George Magnus captures perhaps better than
anything, not only the reason why the global economy grew with the speed
it did over the past 40 years, not only why "globalization" (a/k/a
finding news places to issue debt in exchange for secured assets and
unsecured cash flows all the while under the umbrella of globalist
organizations: see
Confessions of an Economic Hit Man)
was the primary urgency for the status quo, not only why the developed
world managed to delay the inevitable day of reckoning for as long as
it did, but most importantly, why the global day of
debt-saturated reckoning is coming.
While the plight of precious metal mining in the 3rd largest gold producer in the world has been
well-documented here,
as on ongoing strike in various South African mines has crippled
precious metal supply, so far the mining shut down had not spread
outside the continent of Africa (excluding the occasional Bolivian and
Venezuelan mine nationalization). Today, however, even more mining
capacity was taken offline, as India's Goa, the country's second largest
iron ore producer, announced it was temporarily ceasing all mining
activity "after an expert panel formed by the central government found
"serious illegalities and irregularities" in mining operations." While
no gold production has been impacted yet, this move, which likely has
political overtones, will likely shift to other extractors soon, as more
production capacity is taken offline, for either labor or kickback
reasons. And as reported previously, demand by the now largest importer
of gold in the world China, refuses to decline with supply, which has
clear implications for the equilibrium price. It remains to be seen if
Goa going dark will push iron-ore prices higher. It is quite likely that
the collapse in Chinese iron-ore demand offline is far greater than
anything Goa will remove from the market and as such will hardly push
iron prices higher.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51838/5183826a21b40b53af68f4ea8c2492e7bd030ff7" alt=""
Casting a broad eye across all asset classes today, the
theme of QE-Off was quite apparent.
USD strength, Gold/Silver leaking lower, Stocks gathering downward
momentum (as high-beta hotels underperform - AAPL 2nd biggest drop in
over 3 months), Treasuries underperforming, and
VIX rising rapidly with notable term structure flattening
(to its lowest of the year). Volume was on the light side - which
suggests this was more longs covering than shorts being laid out (as
positioning into recent strength was light and looks to have capitulated
Thurs/Fri. Dow Transports outperformed - which appeared more a value
rotation as NASDAQ fell back to practically unch (along with the Dow)
from the 8/21 swing highs. Equities definitely led the weakness today as
cross-asset-class correlation broke down, and futures kept falling
after-hours with
S&P 500 e-mini futures closing down 12pts - right at the up-trendline of the recent move.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/790fb/790fb29925c3043d99cc5aed2358cb9c5c159049" alt=""
On
the surface, today's G.19 update, aka the monthly Consumer Credit
Data, was a big disappointment due to a major miss in consumer credit,
which in July dropped by $3.3 billion from $2.708 trillion to $2.705
trillion. The drop was, as always, on a slide in revolving credit, which
dropped for a second consecutive month, this time by just under $5
billion, while non-revolving credit, aka student loans and GM subprime
debt, rose by just $1.5 billion: the lowest monthly increase in this
series since August 2011, when it declined by $9 billion. Expectations
were for an increase of over $9 billion. There was a far bigger problem,
however. The problem is the spike on the chart below which represents
the November to December 2010 transition (source:
Fed).
What happened there is that 3 months after the Fed revised the
consumer credit data last, it decided to re-revise it again. Frankly,
at this point nothing the Fed releases has any credibility, as the
central planners are literally making up data every three months as it
suits them.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5f01/a5f01796cf4892401aa1f222df4207f0cd9677ac" alt=""
The fundamental backdrop, in the shape of economic lead indicators and earnings momentum, has been deteriorating:
manufacturing
PMIs for the US, China, Japan, Korea, the Euro zone, and the UK are
all now sub-50, and consensus earnings growth estimates for 2012 have
been halved in recent months. What has this meant for Global Equities? Well, as UBS notes, in the last three months, very little. The
MSCI AC World index is up more than 12% from the 4 June low.
That markets have rallied while fundamentals have deteriorated in this
manner is unusual. Historically, equity market rebounds have tended to
coincide with a trough in PMIs and earnings momentum – that is, when
PMIs have stopped going down and the pace of earnings downgrades slows
(waiting for PMIs to recover to 50 or for earnings momentum to turn
positive is usually too late).
Markets now appear to be taking
their cues from central bankers: potential policy actions are becoming a
sort of ‘lead indicator of the lead indicators’, if you will.
Given the recent rally, in addition to underlying macro weakness,
policy action - and effective action at that – has become increasingly
important for investors. Without it this
recent rally could end up looking more like a false start than a head start.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33d3f/33d3f50c471ac427102461530e5f017d6ca9507f" alt=""
In two days the entire world will learn if the Fed will do away with
all pretense it is not a political agency, and despite a presidential
election looking in less than two months, proceed with a third historic
round of easing, which according to "experts" may range from nothing
(yes, some actually see no point at all to further goosing banker
bonuses and the AUM of the uber-wealthy which is
all QE4
will achieve), to extension of the ZIRP language, to MBS Twist, to
combined purchase of USTs and Agencies, either with a deadline, or
open-ended. That pretty much rounds it up. No matter what the Fed does
though, the reality is that 100% of Bernanke's action, if not much
more, has already been priced in, even though as we explained,
Bernanke's hands may actually be quite tied due to simple structural
limitations in the bond market, in which the Fed is now a 30%+ active
player, and approaching 70% in the long end. Perhaps a bigger question
is will Bernanke step back from the trees and notice that the forest is
less than 2 months from the presidential election, in essence making
the Fed's decision a political one in everyone's mind, regardless if
more easing was designed to have a political impact. To answer that, we
look at what the Fed has done in the past in the period of 0-2 months
before US presidential elections. The result, as Credit Suisse reports,
is that "
More often than not the policy move inside of the
two-month window prior to the election has been an extension of the
prior regime." All that said, one must keep in mind that all
historical precedents should really be thrown out of the window as
never before in history has the Fed found itself at the Z/NIRP
boundary, with a very limited arsenal of action, and with only prayer
left that this time it will be different, and central planning will
actually work for once.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2580/a2580f6fb0a5b17d2ec5a6087e07b2e5bc40a35e" alt=""
It
is not news that California, despite what the money laundering
practices aided and abetted by the NAR at the ultra-luxury segment of
housing may indicate, is and has been for the past 5 years neck deep in a
massive housing glut (with millions of houses held off the books in
shadow inventory), which together with a complete economic collapse of
this once vibrant economy, which happened to be the world's 7th largest,
led various cities to resort to the socialist practice of
expropriation, or, as it is known in the US,
eminent domain,
whereby a citizen's rights in property - in this case their home -
are forcefully expropriated with due monetary compensation, naturally
set by the expropriator. It is also no secret, that Wall Street, which
has the most to lose by handing over property titles on mortgaged
houses in exchange for money that is well below the nominal value of
the mortgage, is not happy about this draconian quasi-communist
measure, and has apparently told California to cease and desist. It is,
apparently news that California has had enough of these bourgeois
capitalist pawns, and has decided to, appropriately enough, channel El
Duderino, and to tell Wall Street that this aggression against forced
socialist expropriation, by broke deadbeats, will not stand... man.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9d4d/f9d4db976e4b836a96059b1b95e22f2610ac9c06" alt=""
While watching the political conventions over the past couple of weeks, JPMorgan's Michael Cembalest wonders aloud: What if,
something
like the CBO’s Alternative Case scenario came to pass; debt markets
were no longer willing to fund trillion dollar deficits, so the deficit
had to be reduced to 3% of GDP by 2020; taxing the rich was the only
thing the country could agree on doing? If this happened, how high would top marginal Federal income tax rates have to go? The answer, after some number-crunching:
71% for the top bracket, and 57% for the second highest bracket.
Adding state, local, and payroll taxes, and in 'Blue' states like NY
and CA, income taxes will approach 80%. This is not a projection, but an
illustration that
there are not enough Americans subject to the top brackets to reduce the deficit to 3%.
Eventually, the US will more likely have to adopt broader-reaching tax
reform (e.g., raising taxes on the middle class), larger spending cuts
than those already adopted, and/or Federal Reserve monetization of the
public debt.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd524/dd524ce9a971ef6262e43fff63b0796d6f0e6347" alt=""
Ahead of Wednesday's mega-launch of the all-singing, all-dancing, all-happy-ending-providing
(rumor) iPhone 5, the stunning reality is that a recent poll (via
CouponCodes4U) found that 81% of consumers admitted they could not keep up with the latest and greatest from Apple - and worse still that
51% used credit to buy one of the must-have iDevices. As
The Street
notes, the findings of the survey show "the crazy lengths people will
go to be the first person to have the latest iPhone of iPad" and the
pollster was "shocked and very surprised about
how
many Americans freely admit that they are willing to spend their way
into debt by buying Apple gadgets that they simply cannot afford."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c52d8/c52d854dcfa32589e4922897ffc6a91b359dfb77" alt=""
A
few days ago, the BOE's Andy Haldane, rightfully, lamented that the
apparent "solution" to the exponentially growing level of complexity in
the financial system is
more complexity.
Alas, there was little discussion on the far more relevant central
planning concept of fixing debt with even more debt, especially as the
US just crossed $16 trillion in public debt last week, right on
schedule, and as we pointed out over the weekend, there has been
precisely
zero global deleveraging during the so-called
austerity phase. But perhaps most troubling is that with 2 days to go
to what JPM says 77% of investors expect with be a NEW QE round (mostly
MBS) between $200 and $500 billion in QE, the world is, also in the
words of JP Morgan,
drowning in liquidity. In other
words, according to the central planners, not only is debt the fix to
record debt, but liquidity is about to be unleashed on a world that is,
you guessed it, already drowning in liquidity. The bad news: everything
being tried now will fail, as it did before, because nothing has
changed, except for the scale, meaning the blow up will be all that more
spectacular. The good news: at least the Keynesians (or is it simply
Socialists now?) out there will not be able to say we should have just
added one more [ ]illion in debt/liquidity and all would have worked,
just as our textbooks predicted. Because by the time it's over, that
too will have happened.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c275/7c275c172de12a41196c51f9f64ec2faea0ba8d3" alt=""
After Thursday/Friday's capitulative spikes in all things risk-on
(from credit spreads to equity indices and from Swiss 2Y rates to
European VIX), today saw a more modest give back of some of those
gains.
Spanish and Italian bond curves saw quite notable deterioration
(yields up 5-20bps across the curves - dominated by short-dated
weakness) - though of course in the context of the previous week's rally
this was modest. Equity indices fell around 0.25% and
Europe's VIX rose notably
- but again all in the context of the recent rally, these were small
moves. EURUSD regained 1.28 into the European close but the ranges were
mininal in most risk assets and correlation across asset-classes were
low too - just
a noisy day with little signal ahead of the week's more cataclysmic events.
Two signs that fear and instability have reached critical mass are capital flight and capital controls.
Capital flight is people and enterprises moving their capital (cash
and liquid assets) to an overseas "safe haven" to avoid devaluation of
the currency or confiscation of their capital/assets. (Devaluation can
be seen as one method of confiscation; high taxes are another.) Capital
controls are the Central State's way of stemming the flood of cash
leaving the country. Why do they want to stop money leaving? If we
think of each Central State as a neofeudal fiefdom, we understand the
motivation: citizens are in effect serfs who serve the State and its
financial nobility. If the serfs move their capital out of the fiefdom,
it is no longer available as collateral for the banks and a source of
revenue for the State. Once capital has drained away, borrowing and
lending shrink, cutting off the revenue source of the banks (financial
nobility). Since financial activity also declines as cash is withdrawn
from the system, the State's "skim"--transaction fees, sales taxes, VAT
taxes, income taxes, wealth taxes, etc.--also declines. Both the State
and its financial nobility are at increasing risk of decline and
eventual implosion as capital flees the fiefdom. The Central State imposes capital controls as a means of Elite self-preservation.
Watching
Phil LeBlow providing Ford with a reacharound this morning reminded us
of the total farce that is both the forest and the trees of the US
auto industry. We have discussed the FUBAR channel-stuffing and the
subprime-lending SNAFU but now, as Reuters reports,
we see the ugly truth about GM's little baby "the Volt is
over-engineered and over-priced". Nearly two years after the
introduction of the path-breaking plug-in hybrid, GM is still losing as much as $49,000 on each Volt it builds.
Furthermore, there are some Americans paying just $5,050 to drive
around for two years in a vehicle that cost as much as $89,000 to
produce. Of course, with seemingly unlimited Government backing the hope
can continue, funded by the US taxpayer, as GM's Volt development chief
admits "It's true, we're not making money yet," but the Volt will "eventually will make money. As the volume comes up and
we get into the Gen 2 car, we're going to turn (the losses) around."
Estimates on the cost to build a Volt range from $76,000 to $88,000,
according to four industry consultants contacted by Reuters with one
concluding: "I don't see how General Motors will ever get its money back on that vehicle."
Even
in the face of worsening odds of re-election (no sitting government
has been returned to power in EU elections since the start of the
crisis) one would expect national governments to do what is necessary to
maintain current stability. The ultimate arbiter of burden sharing
capacity, or whether the Euro will continue on the steady incremental
path to integration, is whether regular voters vote for it. Hence the
importance of elections, like the Dutch election this week. The
anti-austerity Socialist Party (SP) has gained significant ground on
the incumbent VVD party - focusing the market's attention on the
willingness of the Dutch to meet the 3% of GDP deficit targets in 2013.
The two 'extreme' parties look set to gain considerably more seats,
and either a very broad coalition would be required, including a tail
of small parties, or all four mainstream parties will have to
participate in the new government: either way, government stability
might be questionable. The scenario troubling markets is the
potential for a long government formation process coinciding with the
euro area’s need to fight the crisis and progress communal policies
- though in the last week or two, support for the SP has declined.
With the 2013 budget an immediate test, a 'new' Dutch government faces
decisions over Greece, Cyprus, EFSF bond buying, and a common-bank
supervisory body - none of which have anything like majority support
across the coalitions.
Donations help maintain and defray the operational costs. Paypal, a leading provider of secure
online money transfers, will handle the donations. Thank you for your
contribution.
I'm PayPal Verified
No comments:
Post a Comment