data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e6b8/3e6b8eada9bf677a12b8b72164a7c73e77f957f2" alt=""
Now that the FT is
reporting that
as part of the ongoing emergency talks to rescue an expiring Dexia,
one of the proposals is a spin off of a Dexia "bad bank" - something
which worked for UBS, which is still a partial protectorate of
Switzerland, but will most certainly not work for governmentless
Belgium, the question is "who is next" Luckily, we have the following
handy summary, courtesy of Reuters' Peter Thal Larsen who has pulled a
chart from an Espirito Santo report, showing a 2-D matrix of liquidity
(i.e. liquid assets as a % of wholesale funding assets), versus reliance
on wholesale funding - the one component in European interbank markets
which is now completely dead. Needless to say red is bad. And if one
thinks that Dexia is about to file, then it may be last rites time for
Soc Gen, BNP, Raiffeisen, and DnB Nor.
Gold is garnering strength from overnight news that Greece looks to miss its
debt reduction target. This is causing further fears about the well-being of
Europe in general and is bringing in selling across the global equity
markets.
What is noteworthy about gold in today's session is that it is making this
move towards overhead chart resistance with the Dollar knocking on the door
of the 80 level on the USDX. The European currencies, the Euro, Swiss Franc
and British Pound are all under pressure today as are the commodity
currencies. The result - gold is moving higher in terms of al... more »
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79af3/79af358c217008701e9cd785432ed99a9091611f" alt=""
In
the last hour, financials have accelerated to the downside very
rapidly. It seems perhaps that the credit markets were on to something
and now equities are realizing that something is definitely worrying
market professionals.
MS -5.7% at $12.7 (from highs just above $14 this morning as Cramer
recommended), BAC -4.75% at $5.82 (lows since MAR09), GS -3% at $91.7, C
-6%, XLF worst performing sector -2.5% (Is Kass still renting?)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c098/8c098f417d07e48ec6a29ff7d343b84bff63e5bc" alt=""
As of milliseconds ago, one share of Bank of America stock is now
$5.99, a level it has not seen since the apocalypse back in March 2009,
and upon penetrating it, a huge volume surge followed as an avalanche
of sell orders were activated. However, we are confident this will be
temporary. According to largely amusing rumors, Bank of America will
follow through with its expropriation procedure and withdraw $5 from
longs' brokerage accounts for each share they hold, effectively
doubling the market cap in the process. So you see: there is nothing to
worry about. Warren: resume your bath, both
literal and metaphorical.
Submitted by RANSquawk Video on 10/03/2011 - 12:27
ETC RANSquawk
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ced8c/ced8c8707b72a1f0f1bbd447f3b3ed80708d912e" alt=""
From
significant outperformance early in the European trading day,
Financials lost considerable ground as the US opened and bank funding
problems were admitted. Obviously, Europe had some catch up to do to the
afternoon session in the US Friday, but it went beyond that with
Senior Financials closing near the day's wides even as the broader
equity market in Europe was only down around 1.3%. The underperformance
(against their intrinsic value and peer asset classes) of both Main
(the investment grade credit index) and Senior Financials (which are
both the lowest cost liquid indices to 'hedge' with in European credit
suggest significant macro protection is still being added here. EUR
making new multi-month lows below 1.33 as EURJPY tanks and CEEMEA
sovereigns widening dramatically also does not help restore confidence
as Gold gets a safety bid and USD strengthens.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1b8e/d1b8e3d42e0a86620115e5d2fc42b224fa026f0e" alt=""
Here's what markets do when they break critical support: they re-test lows. That
sets up an eventual target for this decline of 670, which would be a
re-test of the March 2009 lows. Bulls have to answer this question:
once the 200-week MA is broken, why shouldn't this market re-test the
recent low? If it's "different this time," what makes it different from
every other era and market? It might be a good time to recall that
index funds are only "safe" in the sense that they aggregate the risk
of all stocks in the index. A market that declines 40% will take index
funds down 40%. There is nothing "safe" about long-equity funds that
track a market heading down. Nobody knows what will happen tomorrow,
much less 30 days from now or three months from now, but as of this
snapshot of the market, the evidence of a Bear market decline is rather
substantial, and the technical evidence of a Bull market is rather
thin. As the saying goes, keep it simple.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9a93/d9a93d2a85aa6b9184d1303cec2e24b8a58fd12c" alt=""
The
EURUSD as expected, is now in free fall mode, following a plethora of
statement out of place, after coming ECB head Draghi says the bank in
Europe have funding problems (aka a liquidity crisis), the Finland
FinMin has said he does not want an expansion of the EFSF nor does he
expect a solution on the collateral "row", saying a Deal on EFSF
Collateral is uncertain, and lastly, Spain's Salgado has said there is
no need of "quantitative amplification" of the EFSF. In other words,
with the
EFSF leverage meeting
imminent, it appears that pretty much nobody aside from France, and
some Econ PhDs, are banging the table on using a 10x expansion, knowing
all too well that just as Nomura explained last night, such a move is
equivalent to money printing and invites nothing short of hyperinflation
if and when it all goes wrong.
The bulls are all pointing out that we are near the bottom of the
trading range, that 1,120 has held multiple times and the economic data
isn't so horrible. The bears on the other hand can point to a myriad
of problems that have the combination of not having been resolved, but
too many investors hoping they will be. The market has priced in too
rosy of a situation. The bears also point out that the data is
marginally better, but still pretty awful. Finally, from a technical
standpoint, if 1,120 does get broken, 1080 or so seems to be the next
stop. We were sitting here last week, and got saved by a few positive
tape-bombs. Will we see that again? I don't think so.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e1af/6e1af7adb8ae9fa3f53a128d8fbe3378e260acfa" alt=""
Just
like Friday's Chicago PMI, the Manufacturing ISM has now completely
decoupled from not only the developing world, but from the rest of
America, as somehow US manufacturing in September came in better than
expected, printing at 51.6, on expectations of a modest decline from
50.6 in August to 50.5. Commentary from the ISM's Bradley Holcomb: "The
PMI registered 51.6 percent, an increase of 1 percentage point from
August, indicating expansion in the manufacturing sector for the 26th
consecutive month, at a slightly higher rate. The Production Index
registered 51.2 percent, indicating a return to growth after contracting
in August for the first time since May of 2009. The New Orders Index
remained unchanged from August at 49.6 percent, indicating contraction
for the third consecutive month. The Backlog of Orders Index decreased
4.5 percentage points to 41.5 percent, contracting for the fourth
consecutive month and reaching its lowest level since April 2009, when
it registered 40.5 percent.
Comments from respondents generally
reflect concern over the sluggish economy, political and policy
uncertainty in Washington, and forecasts of ongoing high unemployment
that will continue to put pressure on demand for manufactured products."
And reading within the index, the data was not all good, with the all
important New Orders unchanged, while an increase in Price Paid showed a
modest increase in inflation, and hence deterioration in margins.
Compounding the picture, Backlog of orders slumped, while Customer
inventories increased. Altogether a non-impressive number, although at
least it did not post the first contraction in 26 months, as Goldman had
expected.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96077/960770e1467acd7f8114504953b4a3f17743d5ca" alt=""
Minutes
ago Jim Cramer, reverting to his traditional inverse bank psychic,
whose track record needs just one word of reminder, and that is
Bear Stearns,
told everyone that Morgan Stanley is fine. It may well be. However, we
doubt it, as does the market, which just sent out the firm's CDS up
another 32bps to 528bps, the widest since 10/13/08 having only traded
wider than this level from 9/16/08 to 10/13/08. Critically for those
looking at CDS not being as bad as during the peak of the crisis and
gaining comfort from that - CDS did not trade gently to those extremes -
it gapped unmercifully wider with incredible day to day volatility.
Furthermore, for those talking about how illiquid CDS are and easily
manipulated, we remind them that it is bonds that cracked first (a much
more broadly owned and traded set of instruments) and only very
recently has CDS started to catch up to the wide/risky levels at which
bonds trade.
Dear Daily Readers (500-750).
I run this blog to help keep you informed and ahead of the herd.
I make Nothing for this service. (Not to mention the 4 hours a day labor 7 days a week).
In 2009 I had a loss of $60.00 running this blog. 2 months internet access. (I wouldn't need this as my phone has internet)
In 2010 $360.00 internet access + $150.00 computer repair/hard drive.(I only use the laptop for the blog).
In 2011 $360.00 internet access + $400.00 Cheap laptop + $100.00 replacement modem/router (old ones died).
Total -$1430.00
Donations from Tim, Hui, James, David and Shaun +$130.00 (Thank You your donations are greatly appreciated).
That leaves a loss of - $1300.00
Any help would be Greatly Appreciated.
Please consider making a small donation, to help cover some of the hard costs for running this blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment