data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/697b2/697b27f17ffe20b51da8ff979a560814a4647fd7" alt=""
Goodbye Super-Committee, Hello Stupor-Committee: It's Official - "No Agreement"
As if anyone is actually surprised by the headlines appearing from Bloomberg with regard the Super-Committee - which in retrospect is perhaps a little aggressively-named:While not immediate, it would seem obvious that a ratings downgrade can't be far behind this event given the reasoning for the last downgrade and the clear indication by this lack of agreement that nothing-has-changed.*SUPERCOMMITTEE SAID TO ANNOUNCE NO AGREEMENT REACHED
*U.S. DEBT SUPERCOMMITTEE ANNOUNCEMENT SAID LIKELY ON MONDAY
Kyle Bass Destroys The Ponzi-Prone Debt Sustainability Arguments Of The Status Quo...And Why Germany Can't Save The World
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4938c/4938cce0ff320718be2cae5db6c29a14300b2948" alt=""
Nomura "Goes There" With "The Legal Aspects Of A Eurozone Breakup"
Below we present the note from Nomura which is making the rounds today following the WSJ article referencing it and which touches upon a topic discussed by Zero Hedge way back before even the second Greek bailout from July 21, namely that the statutory law governing the sovereign bond indenture (i.e., whether bonds are issued under Greek or English law) should have major implications for trading dynamics due to the defatul fallback currency in the case of a currency collapse. In a nutshell: "Bonds issued under local law, such as Greek law, would likely be converted from euros into a new local currency—a blow to any investors left holding the paper. "New" currencies, such as a new drachma, could rapidly fall in value by as much as 50%, according to most estimates. Foreign-law debt, on the other hand, would be more likely to remain in euros, assuming a smaller euro still existed at all, the bank said." That Nomura and the WSJ is only half a year late with this discussion is not surprising. What is surprising is that the discussion has appeared in the first place: needless to say this is another rhetorical escalation in the push to get Merkel on the "same page" as it being telegraphed all too loudly that investors are now actively gearing up for a Eurozone collapse. Then again Nomura bankers are people too and deserve to be well paid for being part of the detested 1%. How else will this happen unless they too join the onslaught by the global banking syndicate which now consists of Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan, Barclays, Credit Suisse, and virtually everyone else, expect for Goldman of course, which appears quite happy with the chips falling as they may. After all, it already has Europe by the political short hairs. Now it just needs to take charge financially too. If in the process a few not so good banks are converted into omelette, so be it.Buyers Of Last Resort: As Dumping Accelerates, Here Is Who Is Stuck Buying Another €741 Billion In Italian Bonds
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d8ea/2d8ea73a0c184c9e6070b13aeff49765d4d72f56" alt=""
Spoiler alert: There will be no surprise "I see dead bondholders"-type ending here. Having suggested precisely what the BTP trading dynamics look like previously, we now get official confirmation. With everyone else dumping Italian bonds in the open market, there are only two parties on the bid side: the ECB, and Italian banks. That's it. The only question is "how much" in order to determine at what point the selling onslaught will overhwhelm both insolvent Italian banks whose Risk Weighted capital will soon become too high forcing them out of the market, as well as drag down Draghi's recently expanded bond buying desk (we would say trading, but that would imply a two way market). Here is Barclays with the full breakdown: "Italy’s government bonds, representing the largest bond market in Europe, or the third largest in the world, have been particularly unstable since the beginning of July. The sheer size of the €1.6trn outstanding stock, of which around €220bn of bonds and €120bn of bills are rolled over every year, begs the questions who will be the buyers going forward. We thus update the breakdown of Italian bond holders which we presented in July (see Who Owns Italy's Government Debt? July 29, 2011), and analysed who has been selling and buying between the beginning of July (when widening started) and end of September (as of the latest available data). ECB has been the main buyer since August 8th, and held 4% of the Italian bond market as of September. Domestic holders, mainly financial institutions (banks) have gradually increased their holdings, taking domestic holding from 55% to 56% of the total market. Foreign investors, consisting of European non-Italian banks and real money investors as well as international asset managers, have been the main seller of BTPs, reducing their holdings from 45% to 39%." As said earlier - nothing at all unexpected: everyone who can get out is getting out. The only buyers are those for whom selling equates to suicide. That said, we wish Italian banks and the ECB the best of luck as they seek to purchase the €741 billion in bonds that are still to be offloaded as Merkel persists in refusing to let the ECB even considering announcing monetization intentions.
Ron Paul "Faces The Nation" On September 11 And Other Key Topics
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff40c/ff40ce4c8f0508938ac5c97dcc5d2937475a1f10" alt=""
Guest Post: Antiquities: The Ageless Asset
The 2008 collapse of the United States financial institutions and the recent economic events around the world have sent investors scrambling for smarter and safer ways in which to store and grow their capital. The common questions being asked are “What is good?” and “Where to now?” These questions could be answered, however, by taking a step back in history.Somehow Barclays Makes The Outcome Of The Spanish General Election Another Reason For The ECB To Print
If Johnny Cochran was defending the global ponzi, his legendary line would be: "if the glove doesn't fit, the ECB must print." Because based on commentary from the banking cartel over the past two weeks which has made it abundantly clear the world will end any minute unless the ECB proceeds with backstopping Europe to a far greater degree than it already has (and with €1 Trillion a;ready handed out it is not very easy to make the case JCTrichet's regime was exactly frugal), it appears that according to Wall Street experts the "logical"outcome to any possible event in the coming months and weeks is nothing short of an outright monetizing onslaught: Initial claims missed by 1,000 -> ECB must print; people not digesting enough iPads -> ECB must print; a head on collision with an asteroid is coming -> ECB must print. While we mostly mock what is a certain outcome regardless (anyone who believes that the regime will willingly do the right thing even with Goldman now firmly in control of Europe should have their head checked... although one can surely dream) the narrative is now getting outright ridiculous: the latest case in point is Barclays' commentary on the November 20 general election, whose conclusion is that, we kid you not, the ECB must print. To wit: "Polls are signaling a clear victory for the Partido Popular (PP) in Spain. Another round of labour market reforms, banking sector restructuring and enhanced fiscal consolidation are the likely priorities for the new government. Those policies would undoubtedly be welcome by markets, yet may not be enough to stabilise the Spanish sovereign. Ultimately, we think it likely that the ECB will need to step up its support." In other news, the glove doesn't fit.Guest Post: MF Global - A Fractal In A Frying Pan
Gerald Celente, in an interview with Russia Today, claims he cannot access his PM trading account or get answers to his inquiries. It turns out Lind-Waldock, who he originally had the account with, was subsequently bought out by the now bankrupting MF Global. Understandably distraught, Celente asserts, “They took my money out of my account, six figures, and they have it. They closed out two of my positions, and I cannot get any answers, and I can’t get my money.” Celente got many of us thinking—“If a guy like him can be refused access to his money, then who is safe?” Some argue he should not have been buying “paper gold.” Celente states that he was buying PM futures and taking delivery. “Max Keiser” the “Silver Bears” “Turd Fergusen” and more, have encouraged us to buy silver and “Bust the Comex.” Many of us here on Zero Hedge have fantasized in the comments section about someone wealthy enough to lay a few billion on the Comex for PMs and then stand for delivery. Celente, it is arguable, was doing this not only for himself but perhaps for Joe and Josephine Average who do not have the ammunition to fight this fight. But as I got to thinking, I realized all of the above misses a valuable take away lesson. It is not simply the case that MF Global is a “first domino to fall” or a “canary in the coal mine” or a “harbinger of collapse.” MF Global is a fractal in a frying pan.The Complete And Annotated Guide To The European Bank Run (Or The Final Phase Of Goldman's World Domination Plan)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2ae5/d2ae56365f470242137bc4cfdbf5a9f75d90594d" alt=""
November 20 2011: Why Germany is right to refuse to bailout Europe
Ilargi at The Automatic Earth - 2 hours ago
John Vachon Real BLANK Spaghetti November 1940"Greek restaurant in Paris, Kentucky." The word ITALIAN has been painted over after Mussolini's Fascist regime invaded Greece. Ilargi: Here's why Germany is wise to refuse using the ECB to buy up anything not nailed down in Europe. All economic forecasts for countries in the periphery -which itself grows as we go along- are based on unrealistically
No comments:
Post a Comment