data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1c61/a1c6192a3ba511c62b1d55a63ee70482776c954b" alt=""
Some
final details are coming out from Europe this evening on the EFSF structure, size, and funding. We
provided a framework for understanding the entity this morning, along with some views on just how successful it would (or would not) be.
EFSF CEO Regling stated that various approaches will be used simultaneously, providing the entity with
more funding flexibility, which is
odd since in the next breath he notes the decision to tap the short-dated debt markets in December
(seems with all that flexibility you might want to go a little further
out). The current lending capacity is EUR 440bn, and they expect a
20-30% partial protection approach meaning they could theoretically
leverage around EUR 250bn by around 3-4x. What is most ironic is German
FinMin
Schaeuble's comments,
via The Telegraph, that "although Europe desperately needed a fund "capable of action",
plans
for the EFSF were too "intricate and complex" for investors to
understand", further noting that the fund won't stem the debt crisis.
Bank of America now precisely at $5.00 following an after hours
downgrade from A to A-. We note that BofA's CDS widened 10bps today
while MER CDS widened 18bps and notably wider (we haven't seen runs post
downgrade) and we wonder how this will impact the firm's huge
derivative book which was recently moved to the Bank's higher rated, and
deposit backed unit for its better rating support. In fact, following
such a drastic action, it is quite likely that derivatives units across
the board will see counterparties scrambling to demand a far greater
cash cushion for fears of the same downgrade waterfalls that took down
AIG and MF Global.
UPDATE: The S&P downgrade after-hours of the
major financials is dragging ES lower and more in line with medium-term
CONTEXT. BAC lost $5 momentarily.
Bank Of America and Morgan Stanley closed today down around 7% from
the 0931ET tick yesterday with BofA managing to defend the $5 Maginot
Line once again - though closing almost at their lows.
Tech and
Financials were the worst sectors of the day (and the only sectors
with negative performance) as Energy outperformed dragged by a
war-premium-driven Oil price that crossed $100 intraday but
ended just shy of it (up 2.5% from its intraday lows). After some early
vol, FX markets trod water post the European close, practically
unchanged on the day (and DXY -0.7% on the week) as equity markets once
again outperformed credit in their illusory manner (though IG and HY
did rally some on the day). Correlations continue to deteriorate across
a broad basket of risk assets as
TSY yields oscillated up and
then down and then up into the close but it was Oil and AUDJPY's trend
up that supported ES more than anything today.
Why do Banks remain such lousy investments?
- Is the revenue model fundamentally broken?
- Is the capital model fundamentally broken?
- Is the risk model fundamentally broken?
- Is the compensation model fundamentally broken?
- None of the above?
- All of the above?
Do I REALLY have to give you the answers to these questions?
Submitted by RANSquawk Video on 11/29/2011 - 16:17
ETC RANSquawk
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79b83/79b830157ef1d08815c7e324e19ce7ba5480fe5a" alt=""
Looking
back at the year it is amazing to think that just how much has already
happened in the year that was, and still has at least one month left,
unless of course the accountants have something to say about it and the
calendar is cut short by a month or so to allign with Jefferies Fiscal
Year End. Hopefully without jinxing any fireworks, we present one of
the best lookbacks at what has transpired in Europe, courtesy of this
interactive timeline from Reuters. Also hopefully without spoiling too
much, here is the not so surprising ending - the Titanic sinks in the
end.
Update: It appears that Portugal is fighting a valiant battle, with the site back on and off intermitently.
LulzSec, which had been missing lately from the mainstream news, has
struck again, this time with the site of the Portuguese Parliament. It
is unclear just how the Portuguese pissed off the hacker collective,
but as they say in trading floors when they want to get that pesky
salesman off the line pronto "it is what it is." Link to a DDOSed
Parliamento.pt here.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8025a/8025a42fba907a51f18f98decf9e098d8a34740b" alt=""
Today's ISDA
settlement auction process for the Dynegy CDS credit event
offers some perspective on the smartest of the smart of our dealer
community. Bloomberg notes that RBS was forced to pay a $1.9mm penalty
for massively missing the inside bid-offer at the initial auction. In
our humble opinion,
it would appear that the CDS trading desk
got their math wrong and posted a discount (1-R) instead of the Price
they were willing to trade the deliverable bonds at. Their
29.5/31.5 bid/offer would invert to a much more reasonable 68.5/70.5
perfectly straddling the $69.5 initial midpoint of the auction.
We suspect the RBS pink slips were flying rather fast on this mathematical error... Although since the BLS also works on a 1-R basis, this means that initial jobless claims will be one less for the week.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ceb84/ceb84716a39c694cb480e2cf3c9166b34025917a" alt=""
We
doubt many will be surprised by the latest presidential polling
update from Gallup, and certainly not the record nearly 50 million
Americans on foodstamps, but here it is nonetheless, from
US News: "President Obama's slow ride down Gallup's daily presidential job approval index has finally passed below Jimmy Carter,
earning Obama the worst job approval rating of any president at this stage of his term in modern political history.
Since March, Obama's job approval rating has hovered above Carter's,
considered among the 20th century's worst presidents, but today
Obama's punctured Carter's dismal job approval line. On their
comparison chart,
Gallup put Obama's job approval rating at 43 percent compared to Carter's 51 percent."
One can only imagine what would happen to Obama's ratings if indeed
the Iranian hostage situation escalated and the president was forced to
get involved, in addition to oil spiking to "doomsday" levels of
course as Pimco's worst case predicts: "Back in 1979, Carter was far
below Obama until the Iran hostage crisis, eerily being duplicated in
Tehran today with Iranian protesters storming the British embassy.
The early days of the crisis helped Carter's ratings, though his
failure to win the release of captured Americans, coupled with a bad
economy, led to his defeat by Ronald Reagan in 1980." And while some
may say this is merely a one time blip, a longer-term average shows
otherwise: "Gallup finds that Obama's overall job approval rating so
far has averaged 49 percent. Only three former presidents have had a
worse average rating at this stage:
Carter, Ford, and Harry S. Truman.
Only Truman won re-election in an anti-Congress campaign that Obama's
team is using as a model." On the other hand, neither Ford nor Carter
has such erudite opponents as Herman "I did not sleep with those 999
women" Cain.
Thank You
I'm PayPal Verified
No comments:
Post a Comment