The financial system is once
again overleveraged. Meanwhile, the large banks continue to be insolvent
due to their gargantuan derivative exposure. Put another way, the
financial system is primed for another 2008 episode. The very same
issues that caused 2008 remain in place. Leverage is far too high. And
the unregulated derivatives market remains a multi-hundred trillion
dollar problem.
Bond
markets have seen subdued trading but Greek bonds are again under
pressure and the Greek 10 year yield has risen to 17.37% in increasingly
illiquid trade. The dawning reality that the U.S. will be downgraded
due to its appalling fiscal position led to new record nominal gold and
silver prices yesterday. Denial regarding the possibility of a U.S.
default continues with some analysts denying that such an event is
“possible”. US Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke warned overnight
that a default on America's debt will spark a major crisis and send
shockwaves through the global economy. "The Treasury security is viewed
as the safest and most liquid security in the world, and the notion it
would become suddenly unreliable and illiquid would throw shockwaves
through the entire global financial system," he told a congressional
committee.
The reason we have not been covering this year's
iteration of the European stress test closely (and the reason why we
will not even mention next year's, if there is a Europe next year) is
because it was guaranteed apriori that it would be just as farcical as
its original version, and result in glaringly failing institutions in
the 91-bank sample tested as "passing." Sure enough, The Independent has
just reported that all Irish banks have passed the test "comfortably" -
a list that includes such horrors as Bank of Ireland, Allied Irish
Banks and Irish Life and Permanent Plc, which even Moody's suggested
would have to fail to avoid last year's farce when AIB passed only to
have to be bailed out two months later. And with that we can close the
book on this year's stress test before it is even released.
So much for the
Empire Manufacturing index
being a harbinger of an economic pick up. With virtually everyone on
Wall Street expecting a positive print, with the average at +5.00, the
actual number of -3.76 comes as yet another confirmation of the
(f)utility of Wall Street groupthink. While it was a modest bounce from
the June -7.79, this first July manufacturing indication, which coming
negative means the contraction is now well into its second month, and
has ugly undertones for Q3 GDP, which we expect most banks will revise
their expectations lower in the aftermath of yesterday's JPM downgrade
of the US economy. And while there was some good margin news with Prices
Paid dropping by 13, or more than Prices Received which declined by 6
points, a far more troubling indicator this month
is the collapse in the Number of Employees Index to 1.11 from 10.20, or the lowest of 2011.
This is not good for July NFP numbers after the already atrocious June
employment data. Elsewhere on the inflationary front, CPI missed
expectations of a -0.1% drop, instead printing at -0.2%, the lowest
since June 2010
. The reason was the 4.4% plunge in the Energy Index, the largest drop since December 2008
. That
said, the core CPI was unchanged at 0.3%, higher than expectations of
0.2%, due to increases in prices for shelter, apparel, new vehicle, used
cars and trucks and medical care. In other words: all the things that
people need right after food and gas. We would venture to guess that in
addition to S&P < 1,000, core CPI coming in negative is the other
QE3 gating factor.
The latest June economic datapoints in the form
of Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization confirm the weakness
is far more than just a soft patch: IP was up 0.2%, missing expectations
of 0.3%, with the prior now having been revised to negative 0.1% from
up 0.1%. Capacity Utilization was unchanged at 76.7% on expectations of a
rise to 76.9%: this is what happens when the economy is still
struggling with an inventory hoarding glut. And with inventories
continuing to rise and being the only silver lining, expect these
indicator to post further weakness well into Q3. Naturally, Japan is to
blame once again: "In the second quarter, supply chain disruptions
following the earthquake in Japan curtailed the production of motor
vehicles and parts and restrained output in related industries; the
production index for overall manufacturing was little changed for the
quarter."
Today's
bad economic data trifecta is complete, with the UMichigan consumer
confidence number plummeting to 63.8 from 71.5, and well below consensus
of 72.2. The number is far below the lowest Wall Street prediction of
68 (upper end of range was 75) and the worst since March 2009. The good
thing for the Fed's QE3 plans is that high future inflation expectations
are getting unanchored, with 1 year expectations down from 3.8% to
3.4%, and 5 Year down to 2.8% from 3.0%. A little lower and it will be
just right.
This
is not what Europe needed to hear with just hours until the official
Stress Test release: while everyone expects the 26 reject banks already
listed by Moody's previously to fail (and their "passing" will only
further discredit the stress test), nobody had dared to utter a peep
about the true shaky behemoths at the heart of Europe's banking system,
chief among which is Deutsche Bank. Until today. SocGen analyst Hank
Calenti just told the firm's clients in a note that not only Deutsche
Bank, but also Commerzbank and Banco Popolare may be "near fails" under
the adverse (we assume one exists) Stress Test scenario. To wit:
"Deutsche
Bank may fall into the ‘near-fail’ zone under the adverse scenario, due
to the full application of CRD III in the stress test results. As
noted by our equity colleagues in their publication of 19 May 2011,
Will the upcoming EBA bank stress test trigger further capital raising?,
Banco Popolare and Commerzbank may also be ‘near fails’." He continues:
"We do not believe that the possibility of Deutsche Bank as a ‘near
fail’ is currently priced in the CDS markets." Guess what that means: "
We recommend buying subordinated CDS protection on Deutsche Bank and
we recommend selling subordinated CDS protection on HSBC as a means to
hedge against - and possibly capitalise on - the results of the EU bank
stress tests." Well, there is still 100 minutes in which to put the
trade on.
Step aside Goldman "Shitty Deal" Sachs and JP
Morgan MBS settlements. Enter Deutsche Bank. After the two biggest
American hedge funds already settled with the SEC over their
transgressions of selling MBS to clients even as they were betting
actively against such securities, now it is Deustche Bank's turn, and
more specifically head Deutsche bank MBS trader Greg "I Am Short Your
House" Lippman. And unlike Goldman and JP Morgan which actually are
profitable, and could afford the settlement, life for DB may not be just
as simple. Reuters reports: "Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossman
filed a scorcher of a suit against Deutsche Bank Wednesday, claiming
that the bank sold financial services group Dexia more than $1 billion
in mortgage-backed securities at the same time Deutsche Bank bet $10
billion that those notes would fail. The 175-page (!) New York state
supreme
court complaint is Bernstein Litowitz's second major new MBS filing in a week, coming on the heels of
Allstate's suit against Morgan Stanley. The Deutsche complaint is filled with eye-popping allegations.
Bernstein
claims, for instance, that senior traders at the bank described the
securities they were peddling to clients like Dexia as "crap," "pigs,"
and "generally horrible." One trader, Greg Lippman, allegedly wrote,
"DOESN'T THIS DEAL BLOW" in an e-mail to a colleague about an offering
Dexia sank $23 million into. In another e-mail the complaint
cites, this one to a hedge fund investor, Lippman allegedly disclosed a
$1 billion short position on mortgage-backed securities that was going
to make him
"oceans of money." And courtesy of said
oceans, Greg will be more than happy to afford the drop that will be
imminent settlement he wil have to pay as nothing ever changes.
Multiple Botched and Mismanaged Stress Test Have Created The Makings Of A Pan-European Bank Run
No comments:
Post a Comment